YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Study of Laboratory Compaction System Variance Using an Automatic Proctor Calibration Device

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Scott J. Wasman
    ,
    Michael C. McVay
    ,
    Keith Beriswill
    ,
    David Bloomquist
    ,
    John Shoucair
    ,
    David Horhota
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000599
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper describes the development of a portable dynamic energy calibrator (PDEC) for mechanical Proctor compaction machines along with an analysis of system variance on a silty sand’s (A-2-4) dry unit weights. The PDEC measures a rammer’s kinetic energy delivered to the sample and the compressive energy retained in the sample. The monitoring system uses a photoelectric gate and impact force sensor attached to the machine. When the rammer mass is included, the system’s impedance can be calculated. Next, 30 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)-approved machines throughout the state were tested, and summary statistics (i.e., mean, standard deviation, and so on) of the kinetic and compressive energies of the machines were found. Scatter plots of hammer kinetic energy along with sample energies allowed for identification of poorly functioning machines (e.g., low-impact energies or variations in mold support). Finally, a series of blind modified compaction tests were performed on A-2-4 soil at six labs at dry and wet of optimum. A regression analysis of the mean and variance of dry unit weight as a function of moisture content, kinetic energy, and sample energy was undertaken. Approximately 50% of the measured dry unit weight variance was associated with variance of kinetic energy, sample energy, or sample moisture. The other 50% of the variance was attributed to operator influence (i.e., sample preparation, lift thicknesses, moisture determination, and so on), which was not measured in this study.
    • Download: (1.461Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Study of Laboratory Compaction System Variance Using an Automatic Proctor Calibration Device

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/66986
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorScott J. Wasman
    contributor authorMichael C. McVay
    contributor authorKeith Beriswill
    contributor authorDavid Bloomquist
    contributor authorJohn Shoucair
    contributor authorDavid Horhota
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:56:07Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:56:07Z
    date copyrightApril 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000635.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66986
    description abstractThis paper describes the development of a portable dynamic energy calibrator (PDEC) for mechanical Proctor compaction machines along with an analysis of system variance on a silty sand’s (A-2-4) dry unit weights. The PDEC measures a rammer’s kinetic energy delivered to the sample and the compressive energy retained in the sample. The monitoring system uses a photoelectric gate and impact force sensor attached to the machine. When the rammer mass is included, the system’s impedance can be calculated. Next, 30 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)-approved machines throughout the state were tested, and summary statistics (i.e., mean, standard deviation, and so on) of the kinetic and compressive energies of the machines were found. Scatter plots of hammer kinetic energy along with sample energies allowed for identification of poorly functioning machines (e.g., low-impact energies or variations in mold support). Finally, a series of blind modified compaction tests were performed on A-2-4 soil at six labs at dry and wet of optimum. A regression analysis of the mean and variance of dry unit weight as a function of moisture content, kinetic energy, and sample energy was undertaken. Approximately 50% of the measured dry unit weight variance was associated with variance of kinetic energy, sample energy, or sample moisture. The other 50% of the variance was attributed to operator influence (i.e., sample preparation, lift thicknesses, moisture determination, and so on), which was not measured in this study.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleStudy of Laboratory Compaction System Variance Using an Automatic Proctor Calibration Device
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000599
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian