Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid Rust
contributor authorRobert Rathbone
contributor authorKamyar C. Mahboub
contributor authorTom Robl
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:55:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:55:50Z
date copyrightSeptember 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000489.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66828
description abstractThe study examined several formulations that may serve as a green substitute for traditional portland cement. The primary objective of the project was to produce a durable, low-energy cementitious material from flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum that was converted to hemihydrate. The study also included spent ash from circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC), and Class F fly ash. Hemihydrate would give the by-product cement early strength development, and the spent-bed/ultrafine ash blend would provide the by-product cement with long-term strength (gaining slowly at first) and decrease solublity. A spent-bed/ultrafine ash ratio of
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFormulating Low-Energy Cement Products
typeJournal Paper
journal volume24
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000456
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record