YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Design of an Infrastructure Project Using a Point-Based Methodology

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Hyun Woo Lee
    ,
    Iris D. Tommelein
    ,
    Glenn Ballard
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000103
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Our experience in engineering education and practice indicates that methodologies for architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) design management are characterized only to a limited extent. In domains other than AEC such methodologies are well-established and contribute to improving design performance. A step towards advancing AEC design management is to characterize design practices and explore the methodologies on which they may be based. In this vein, the authors describe a design practice observed while participating in the development of a design-build-operate-and-maintain (DBOM) proposal for an infrastructure megaproject. The development team’s design process followed a point-based methodology, i.e., early selection from a small set of design alternatives. The team was structured as a three-party joint venture, but, as observed, integration of efforts and collaboration among its design engineers and contractors were difficult and infrequent. The point-based design methodology used showed limitations. The authors counterpose methodologies including select-and-reuse or set-based design. Especially the latter is worth adopting in our AEC industry because it has resulted in superior design performance in other domains. By characterizing and documenting a design management methodology used in practice and counterposing alternatives, the authors aim to spur discussion on the teaching and practical application of AEC design management methodologies.
    • Download: (144.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Design of an Infrastructure Project Using a Point-Based Methodology

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/66160
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHyun Woo Lee
    contributor authorIris D. Tommelein
    contributor authorGlenn Ballard
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:35Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:35Z
    date copyrightJuly 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29me%2E1943-5479%2E0000134.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66160
    description abstractOur experience in engineering education and practice indicates that methodologies for architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) design management are characterized only to a limited extent. In domains other than AEC such methodologies are well-established and contribute to improving design performance. A step towards advancing AEC design management is to characterize design practices and explore the methodologies on which they may be based. In this vein, the authors describe a design practice observed while participating in the development of a design-build-operate-and-maintain (DBOM) proposal for an infrastructure megaproject. The development team’s design process followed a point-based methodology, i.e., early selection from a small set of design alternatives. The team was structured as a three-party joint venture, but, as observed, integration of efforts and collaboration among its design engineers and contractors were difficult and infrequent. The point-based design methodology used showed limitations. The authors counterpose methodologies including select-and-reuse or set-based design. Especially the latter is worth adopting in our AEC industry because it has resulted in superior design performance in other domains. By characterizing and documenting a design management methodology used in practice and counterposing alternatives, the authors aim to spur discussion on the teaching and practical application of AEC design management methodologies.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDesign of an Infrastructure Project Using a Point-Based Methodology
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume28
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000103
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian