Systems-Based Approach to Preparedness for, Response to, and Recovery from Natural and Human-Made DisastersSource: Leadership and Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004Author:Yacov Y. Haimes
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000183Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This article posits that the complex technical, organizational, and communication process associated with preparedness for, response to, and recovery from natural and human-made disasters is harmonious and synonymous with the process of risk assessment, management, and communication. Modelers of these processes must recognize that the states of the system, whether of the affected infrastructures or of the communities, constitute essential building blocks of the constructed models. The physical states of all infrastructures and the states of well-being of all communities are functions of time; thus, the time frame in modeling, as well as in preparedness and in risk analysis, is of paramount importance. Furthermore, the vulnerability and resilience of a system (physical or natural) to a specific threat (initiating event) are manifestations of the states of the system. This implies that the risk to a targeted system from a specific threat is a function of the states, the vulnerability, the resilience of the system, the time frame, and the specific threat. The term
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Yacov Y. Haimes | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:54:22Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:54:22Z | |
| date copyright | October 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000220.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66014 | |
| description abstract | This article posits that the complex technical, organizational, and communication process associated with preparedness for, response to, and recovery from natural and human-made disasters is harmonious and synonymous with the process of risk assessment, management, and communication. Modelers of these processes must recognize that the states of the system, whether of the affected infrastructures or of the communities, constitute essential building blocks of the constructed models. The physical states of all infrastructures and the states of well-being of all communities are functions of time; thus, the time frame in modeling, as well as in preparedness and in risk analysis, is of paramount importance. Furthermore, the vulnerability and resilience of a system (physical or natural) to a specific threat (initiating event) are manifestations of the states of the system. This implies that the risk to a targeted system from a specific threat is a function of the states, the vulnerability, the resilience of the system, the time frame, and the specific threat. The term | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Systems-Based Approach to Preparedness for, Response to, and Recovery from Natural and Human-Made Disasters | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 12 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Leadership and Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000183 | |
| tree | Leadership and Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |