YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2011:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Peter J. Boucher
    ,
    M. Scott Devlin
    ,
    Amarjit Singh
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Treatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands. There is regulatory oversight at the federal, state, and county levels, with requirements of the Clean Water Act providing the most guidance. Legal liabilities are dominated by the risks associated with bioaccumulation of toxic materials in the wetlands and the effects they may have on migratory birds and endangered species. Technical aspects of water quality discharge are explained and related to regulatory enforcement. The status of existing regulations that affect wetland use are reviewed—the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone Act, and the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production regulation. The Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules are also reviewed for their regulation of wetlands. Major findings of six court cases with application to wetlands are presented. Three case studies, the Kesterson Marsh, the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, and a New Mexico State University study on recirculating wastewater aquaculture are provided, which demonstrate successes and failures that provide lessons to help conform to the regulations in place for water discharge.
    • Download: (131.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65813
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPeter J. Boucher
    contributor authorM. Scott Devlin
    contributor authorAmarjit Singh
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:00Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000086.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65813
    description abstractTreatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands. There is regulatory oversight at the federal, state, and county levels, with requirements of the Clean Water Act providing the most guidance. Legal liabilities are dominated by the risks associated with bioaccumulation of toxic materials in the wetlands and the effects they may have on migratory birds and endangered species. Technical aspects of water quality discharge are explained and related to regulatory enforcement. The status of existing regulations that affect wetland use are reviewed—the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone Act, and the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production regulation. The Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules are also reviewed for their regulation of wetlands. Major findings of six court cases with application to wetlands are presented. Three case studies, the Kesterson Marsh, the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, and a New Mexico State University study on recirculating wastewater aquaculture are provided, which demonstrate successes and failures that provide lessons to help conform to the regulations in place for water discharge.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRegulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2011:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian