Show simple item record

contributor authorYetkin Yildirim
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:59Z
date available2017-05-08T21:53:59Z
date copyrightNovember 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000062.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65795
description abstractTexas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) currently uses general alternative dispute resolution and dispute management tactics to resolve construction claims. The successful application by TxDOT of project partnering methods, critical path management, and the Contract Claims Committee has resulted in a relatively low number of claims filed. However, one weakness in TxDOT’s current methodology is the lack of specific protocol for project-level personnel and administrators. The following survey of TxDOT dispute resolution methods emphasizes the importance of developing a personnel training catalog for Area Engineers in order to avoid costly claim dispute escalation. As the individual primarily responsible for resolving project and district-level disputes, the Area Engineer should be equipped with dispute resolution training if TxDOT wishes to improve the efficiency of its alternative dispute resolution protocol.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCase for Expanding the Claim Dispute Resolution Training of TxDOT Personnel
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000029
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2010:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record