YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Defining Spatial Heterogeneity of Hillslope Infiltration Characteristics Using Geostatistics, Error Modeling, and Autocorrelation Analysis

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Zachary M. Easton
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000602
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Procedures that can characterize spatial correlation and interpolate values at unknown locations can be valuable in capturing spatial trends, may increase sampling accuracy, and reduce error. This study sought to compare three common methods of measuring infiltration, the double ring (DR), sprinkler (SPR), and frame (FRM) methods, on a hillslope to characterize the spatial structure of the infiltration measurements. All infiltration method measurements were log normally distributed; therefore, universal kriging estimators were developed in conjunction with semivariogram analysis and an error model to interpolate infiltration rates under wet and dry antecedent soil conditions. Variability in measured infiltration rates were greatest from the DR and SPR methods, coefficients of variation (CV) ranged from 42–53%, whereas the CV of the FRM method was 27%. This, however, is not unexpected, as the DR and SPR methods had highly significant directional trends and captured a much larger range in infiltration rates on the hillslope. After removing the directional trend in the data, the semivariograms were able to characterize the spatial correlation reassuringly well. Nugget variance was low for most methods/antecedent conditions, indicating that there was little unexplained variation in the semivariogram model. The range of autocorrelation between measurements varied from 17 m for the SPR method to 33 m for the FRM method. Using the modeled correlation, infiltration rates were interpolated at 284 unsampled locations with an average error of 7.8%. These results indicate that methods of measuring the infiltration rate of a soil differ in first order statistical measures (mean and variance), but not substantially in second order statistical measures (spatial structure). This information can be used to characterize physical or environmental phenomenon not easily modeled with deterministic equations.
    • Download: (302.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Defining Spatial Heterogeneity of Hillslope Infiltration Characteristics Using Geostatistics, Error Modeling, and Autocorrelation Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65517
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZachary M. Easton
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:28Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:53:28Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29ir%2E1943-4774%2E0000632.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65517
    description abstractProcedures that can characterize spatial correlation and interpolate values at unknown locations can be valuable in capturing spatial trends, may increase sampling accuracy, and reduce error. This study sought to compare three common methods of measuring infiltration, the double ring (DR), sprinkler (SPR), and frame (FRM) methods, on a hillslope to characterize the spatial structure of the infiltration measurements. All infiltration method measurements were log normally distributed; therefore, universal kriging estimators were developed in conjunction with semivariogram analysis and an error model to interpolate infiltration rates under wet and dry antecedent soil conditions. Variability in measured infiltration rates were greatest from the DR and SPR methods, coefficients of variation (CV) ranged from 42–53%, whereas the CV of the FRM method was 27%. This, however, is not unexpected, as the DR and SPR methods had highly significant directional trends and captured a much larger range in infiltration rates on the hillslope. After removing the directional trend in the data, the semivariograms were able to characterize the spatial correlation reassuringly well. Nugget variance was low for most methods/antecedent conditions, indicating that there was little unexplained variation in the semivariogram model. The range of autocorrelation between measurements varied from 17 m for the SPR method to 33 m for the FRM method. Using the modeled correlation, infiltration rates were interpolated at 284 unsampled locations with an average error of 7.8%. These results indicate that methods of measuring the infiltration rate of a soil differ in first order statistical measures (mean and variance), but not substantially in second order statistical measures (spatial structure). This information can be used to characterize physical or environmental phenomenon not easily modeled with deterministic equations.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDefining Spatial Heterogeneity of Hillslope Infiltration Characteristics Using Geostatistics, Error Modeling, and Autocorrelation Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000602
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian