YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Computational Modeling of Bed Material Shear Stresses in Piston-Type Erosion Rate Testing Devices

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Raphael W. Crowley
    ,
    Corbin Robeck
    ,
    Robert J. Thieke
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000797
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The sediment erosion rate flume (SERF) device was computationally modeled using CD-adapco’s Star-CCM+ at varying flow rates and sample roughnesses so that wall shear stresses could be evaluated during a piston-style erosion test. Shear stress data were matched between the model and data from previous physical tests. Pressure differential upstream and downstream from an eroding specimen displayed similar behavior during both physical and modeled tests in that as eroding sample roughness increased, pressure differential did not appear to change. A series of complicated bed configurations were added to the computational model to quantify the effects of blocking, chunking, or sample overadvancement during an erosion test. Results appeared to indicate that small deviations in sample geometry may have large effects on localized shear stresses. Another series of models was run to provide an explanation for the beginning of blocking or chunking as a result of shear stress development over a rough sample. Results showed that relatively large localized shear stresses may develop simply because of the introduction of roughness. Finally, results also indicated that the most conservative method for future testing is to keep the bottom edge of an eroding sample flush with a flume bottom.
    • Download: (14.54Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Computational Modeling of Bed Material Shear Stresses in Piston-Type Erosion Rate Testing Devices

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/64666
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRaphael W. Crowley
    contributor authorCorbin Robeck
    contributor authorRobert J. Thieke
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:51:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:51:53Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other%28asce%29hy%2E1943-7900%2E0000829.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/64666
    description abstractThe sediment erosion rate flume (SERF) device was computationally modeled using CD-adapco’s Star-CCM+ at varying flow rates and sample roughnesses so that wall shear stresses could be evaluated during a piston-style erosion test. Shear stress data were matched between the model and data from previous physical tests. Pressure differential upstream and downstream from an eroding specimen displayed similar behavior during both physical and modeled tests in that as eroding sample roughness increased, pressure differential did not appear to change. A series of complicated bed configurations were added to the computational model to quantify the effects of blocking, chunking, or sample overadvancement during an erosion test. Results appeared to indicate that small deviations in sample geometry may have large effects on localized shear stresses. Another series of models was run to provide an explanation for the beginning of blocking or chunking as a result of shear stress development over a rough sample. Results showed that relatively large localized shear stresses may develop simply because of the introduction of roughness. Finally, results also indicated that the most conservative method for future testing is to keep the bottom edge of an eroding sample flush with a flume bottom.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComputational Modeling of Bed Material Shear Stresses in Piston-Type Erosion Rate Testing Devices
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000797
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian