YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Signal Postprocessing Technique and Uncertainty Analysis of ADV Turbulence Measurements on Free Hydraulic Jumps

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Martín Romagnoli
    ,
    Carlos M. García
    ,
    Raúl A. Lopardo
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000507
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This note presents experimental results on an error analysis of acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) turbulence measurements in free hydraulic jumps incorporating a recent ADV signal processing technique. The work aims to quantify the influence of each error source in acoustic Doppler measurements (i.e., presence of spikes, Doppler noise, and filtering effects due to the ADV sampling strategy) on variance and integral time scale computations as well as to define the corresponding confidence interval for each reported value. Experiments were conducted for an upstream Froude number of 3.0. The relative error contribution of each source to both raw longitudinal variance and raw longitudinal integral time scale decreases downstream. Inside the zone where aeration effects and high turbulence levels are relevant, Doppler noise constitutes the most important error source. Further downstream, where aeration effects and turbulence levels diminish, the error produced by the presence of spikes can be neglected, whereas the effects of both Doppler noise and ADVs’ sampling strategy are balanced. The relative confidence interval for corrected longitudinal variance ranges between 30 and 10%, whereas the relative uncertainty level for the corrected longitudinal integral time scale varies from 80 to 50%. The results of this study point out the requirement for an adequate signal postprocessing technique and uncertainty analysis of ADV turbulence measurements.
    • Download: (410.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Signal Postprocessing Technique and Uncertainty Analysis of ADV Turbulence Measurements on Free Hydraulic Jumps

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/64358
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMartín Romagnoli
    contributor authorCarlos M. García
    contributor authorRaúl A. Lopardo
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:51:18Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:51:18Z
    date copyrightApril 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29hy%2E1943-7900%2E0000532.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/64358
    description abstractThis note presents experimental results on an error analysis of acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) turbulence measurements in free hydraulic jumps incorporating a recent ADV signal processing technique. The work aims to quantify the influence of each error source in acoustic Doppler measurements (i.e., presence of spikes, Doppler noise, and filtering effects due to the ADV sampling strategy) on variance and integral time scale computations as well as to define the corresponding confidence interval for each reported value. Experiments were conducted for an upstream Froude number of 3.0. The relative error contribution of each source to both raw longitudinal variance and raw longitudinal integral time scale decreases downstream. Inside the zone where aeration effects and high turbulence levels are relevant, Doppler noise constitutes the most important error source. Further downstream, where aeration effects and turbulence levels diminish, the error produced by the presence of spikes can be neglected, whereas the effects of both Doppler noise and ADVs’ sampling strategy are balanced. The relative confidence interval for corrected longitudinal variance ranges between 30 and 10%, whereas the relative uncertainty level for the corrected longitudinal integral time scale varies from 80 to 50%. The results of this study point out the requirement for an adequate signal postprocessing technique and uncertainty analysis of ADV turbulence measurements.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSignal Postprocessing Technique and Uncertainty Analysis of ADV Turbulence Measurements on Free Hydraulic Jumps
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000507
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian