YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Dual Polymer Conditioning of Water Treatment Residuals

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Azize Ayol
    ,
    Steven K. Dentel
    ,
    Ayse Filibeli
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:8(1132)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Conditioning of either wastewater biosolids or water treatment residuals conventionally utilizes a single polymer to improve subsequent dewatering. The sequential addition of two polymers has been reported to enhance biosolids dewaterability, but comparable benefits have not been demonstrated for water treatment residuals. This paper evaluated the use of cationic and nonionic polymers, singly and in combination (dual), to investigate whether dual polymer conditioning of residuals offers any advantages, and to determine whether the results could be accommodated by current mechanistic understandings. For this purpose, lab-scale tests used capillary suction time (CST), supernatant viscosity, zeta potential, streaming current, turbidity, floc size, and rheometric analyses. Comparisons of CST and viscosity results for single and dual polymer additions indicated that dual polymer use gave moderately improved dewaterability, possibly due to the increased mixing utilized for dual polymer addition. Using a cationic polymer produced a less turbid supernatant. Zeta potential and streaming current were not good indicators of conditioning efficacy when a nonionic polymer was used. Rheometric analyses were only meaningful in one selected method for treatment of the data: the area under the rheogram up to a shear rate of
    • Download: (168.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Dual Polymer Conditioning of Water Treatment Residuals

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/63865
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAzize Ayol
    contributor authorSteven K. Dentel
    contributor authorAyse Filibeli
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:50:31Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:50:31Z
    date copyrightAugust 2005
    date issued2005
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282005%29131%3A8%281132%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63865
    description abstractConditioning of either wastewater biosolids or water treatment residuals conventionally utilizes a single polymer to improve subsequent dewatering. The sequential addition of two polymers has been reported to enhance biosolids dewaterability, but comparable benefits have not been demonstrated for water treatment residuals. This paper evaluated the use of cationic and nonionic polymers, singly and in combination (dual), to investigate whether dual polymer conditioning of residuals offers any advantages, and to determine whether the results could be accommodated by current mechanistic understandings. For this purpose, lab-scale tests used capillary suction time (CST), supernatant viscosity, zeta potential, streaming current, turbidity, floc size, and rheometric analyses. Comparisons of CST and viscosity results for single and dual polymer additions indicated that dual polymer use gave moderately improved dewaterability, possibly due to the increased mixing utilized for dual polymer addition. Using a cationic polymer produced a less turbid supernatant. Zeta potential and streaming current were not good indicators of conditioning efficacy when a nonionic polymer was used. Rheometric analyses were only meaningful in one selected method for treatment of the data: the area under the rheogram up to a shear rate of
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDual Polymer Conditioning of Water Treatment Residuals
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:8(1132)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian