Sustainable Disposal of Domestic Sanitary WasteSource: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 002Author:Richard Ashley
,
David Blackwood
,
Nicki Souter
,
Sarah Hendry
,
Jim Moir
,
Judith Dunkerley
,
John Davies
,
David Butler
,
Andrew Cook
,
Jim Conlin
,
Martin Squibbs
,
Andrew Britton
,
Peter Goldie
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The study presented is an example of the assessment of the relative sustainability of either option for disposal of domestic sanitary waste, either via the toilet or via the solid waste route. This required an evaluation of the total (social, economic, environmental, and technical) benefit/cost of implementing and adopting the alternative routes and an assessment of public responsiveness to encouragement to change sanitary waste disposal practices. It illustrates how, even for an apparently straightforward either/or question, the assessment of relative sustainability is complex and the amount of data needed to quantify sustainability indicators is prodigious. The study also provides an appraisal of the effectiveness of public campaigns to reduce waterborne disposal. Important information regarding public attitude and behavior in relation to wastewater systems has been acquired and lessons for ways of encouraging behavioral change to more sustainable ways of living have been gleaned.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Richard Ashley | |
| contributor author | David Blackwood | |
| contributor author | Nicki Souter | |
| contributor author | Sarah Hendry | |
| contributor author | Jim Moir | |
| contributor author | Judith Dunkerley | |
| contributor author | John Davies | |
| contributor author | David Butler | |
| contributor author | Andrew Cook | |
| contributor author | Jim Conlin | |
| contributor author | Martin Squibbs | |
| contributor author | Andrew Britton | |
| contributor author | Peter Goldie | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:47:56Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:47:56Z | |
| date copyright | February 2005 | |
| date issued | 2005 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9372%282005%29131%3A2%28206%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/62664 | |
| description abstract | The study presented is an example of the assessment of the relative sustainability of either option for disposal of domestic sanitary waste, either via the toilet or via the solid waste route. This required an evaluation of the total (social, economic, environmental, and technical) benefit/cost of implementing and adopting the alternative routes and an assessment of public responsiveness to encouragement to change sanitary waste disposal practices. It illustrates how, even for an apparently straightforward either/or question, the assessment of relative sustainability is complex and the amount of data needed to quantify sustainability indicators is prodigious. The study also provides an appraisal of the effectiveness of public campaigns to reduce waterborne disposal. Important information regarding public attitude and behavior in relation to wastewater systems has been acquired and lessons for ways of encouraging behavioral change to more sustainable ways of living have been gleaned. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Sustainable Disposal of Domestic Sanitary Waste | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 131 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Environmental Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206) | |
| tree | Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |