Show simple item record

contributor authorY. F. Leung
contributor authorK. Soga
contributor authorB. M. Lehane
contributor authorA. Klar
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:46:56Z
date available2017-05-08T21:46:56Z
date copyrightDecember 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29gt%2E1943-5606%2E0000407.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/62171
description abstractThis paper compares linear-elastic and nonlinear pile group analysis methods through settlement analyses of hypothetical scenarios and real case studies, and elaborates on the implications for interpretation of pile load test data. Comparisons between linear-elastic and nonlinear methods justify the proposition that pile-to-pile interaction is dominated by linear elasticity, characterized by the small-strain soil stiffness. As the size of a pile group increases, nonlinearity in individual pile behavior becomes overwhelmed by the interaction effects. In such cases, similar estimates will be achieved by both linear and nonlinear methods if the soil modulus is derived from the initial tangent, rather than some secant stiffness, assessed from the load test data. The study clarifies the capabilities and limitations of linear elasticity in pile group analysis and provides guidance on pile test interpretation for analysis of pile group response.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRole of Linear Elasticity in Pile Group Analysis and Load Test Interpretation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000392
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record