Show simple item record

contributor authorMoon S. Nam
contributor authorCumaraswamy Vipulanandan
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:46:49Z
date available2017-05-08T21:46:49Z
date copyrightAugust 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29gt%2E1943-5606%2E0000335.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/62094
description abstractModern methods for designing drilled shafts in soft rock require knowledge of the compressive strength and modulus of the rock. However, rock jointing at many sites prohibits the recovery of samples of sufficient length and integrity to test rock cores in either unconfined or triaxial compression tests. Since rational design procedures usually require values of compressive strength, surrogate methods must be employed to estimate the compressive strength of the rock. The surrogate methods considered in this study was Texas cone penetrometer tests, and performed at several sites in North Central Texas. In order to develop the relationships between Texas cone penetrations and side and base resistances of rock socketed drilled shafts, three field load tests were conducted. Based on the field study and literature reviews, a relationship between Texas cone penetration tests and axial resistances of rock socketed drilled shafts was proposed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRelationship between Texas Cone Penetrometer Tests and Axial Resistances of Drilled Shafts Socketed in Clay Shale and Limestone
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000318
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record