YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Models Quantify the Total Maximum Daily Load Process

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Joseph V. DePinto
    ,
    Paul L. Freedman
    ,
    David M. Dilks
    ,
    Wendy M. Larson
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:6(703)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Mathematical models have been used for many years to assist in the management of water quality. The total maximum daily load (TMDL) process is no exception; models represent the means by which the assimilative capacity of a water body can be quantified and a waste load allocation can be determined such that the assimilative capacity is not exceeded. Unfortunately, in many TMDLs, the use of models has not always adhered to the best modeling practices that have been developed over the past half-century. This paper presents what are felt to be the most important principles of good modeling practice relative to all of the steps in developing and applying a model for computing a TMDL. These steps include: Problem definition and setting management objectives; data synthesis for use in modeling; model selection; model calibration and, if possible confirmation; model application; iterative modeling; and model postaudit. Since mathematical modeling of aquatic systems is not an exact science, it is essential that these steps be fully transparent to all TMDL stakeholders through comprehensive documentation of the entire process, including specification of all inputs and assumptions. The overriding consideration is that data richness and quality govern the level of model complexity that can be applied to a given system. The model should never be more complex than the data allow. Also, in applying a model, one should always attempt to quantify the uncertainty in predictions. In general, quantifying uncertainty is easier with simple models, which is another reason to begin with a simple framework.
    • Download: (164.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Models Quantify the Total Maximum Daily Load Process

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/61197
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJoseph V. DePinto
    contributor authorPaul L. Freedman
    contributor authorDavid M. Dilks
    contributor authorWendy M. Larson
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:44:37Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:44:37Z
    date copyrightJune 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282004%29130%3A6%28703%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/61197
    description abstractMathematical models have been used for many years to assist in the management of water quality. The total maximum daily load (TMDL) process is no exception; models represent the means by which the assimilative capacity of a water body can be quantified and a waste load allocation can be determined such that the assimilative capacity is not exceeded. Unfortunately, in many TMDLs, the use of models has not always adhered to the best modeling practices that have been developed over the past half-century. This paper presents what are felt to be the most important principles of good modeling practice relative to all of the steps in developing and applying a model for computing a TMDL. These steps include: Problem definition and setting management objectives; data synthesis for use in modeling; model selection; model calibration and, if possible confirmation; model application; iterative modeling; and model postaudit. Since mathematical modeling of aquatic systems is not an exact science, it is essential that these steps be fully transparent to all TMDL stakeholders through comprehensive documentation of the entire process, including specification of all inputs and assumptions. The overriding consideration is that data richness and quality govern the level of model complexity that can be applied to a given system. The model should never be more complex than the data allow. Also, in applying a model, one should always attempt to quantify the uncertainty in predictions. In general, quantifying uncertainty is easier with simple models, which is another reason to begin with a simple framework.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleModels Quantify the Total Maximum Daily Load Process
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:6(703)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian