YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Error Assessment for Spectral Representation Method in Random Field Simulation

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Yufeng Gao
    ,
    Yongxin Wu
    ,
    Yuanqiang Cai
    ,
    Hanlong Liu
    ,
    Dayong Li
    ,
    Ning Zhang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000379
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Random fields, such as the wind velocity field and the seismic ground motion field, are usually simulated by the spectral representation method (SRM). The SRM mainly relies on two methods: the random amplitudes method and the random phases method. However, the temporal statistics estimated from one SRM-simulated sample process differs from the target characteristics. Such differences can usually be assessed by the statistical errors, i. e., bias errors and stochastic errors. The closed-form solutions of statistical errors produced by random phases method have been given. This paper gives the closed-form solutions of statistical errors produced by the random phases methods and compares the statistical errors produced by both methods. The comparison of the stochastic errors of power spectral density functions produced by different methods demonstrates that (1) the random amplitudes method exhibits higher but more uniformly distributed stochastic errors than the random phases method; and (2) the stochastic errors produced by the random phases method are dependent on the decomposition method, whereas those produced by the random amplitudes method are not.
    • Download: (309.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Error Assessment for Spectral Representation Method in Random Field Simulation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/60854
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYufeng Gao
    contributor authorYongxin Wu
    contributor authorYuanqiang Cai
    contributor authorHanlong Liu
    contributor authorDayong Li
    contributor authorNing Zhang
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:43:47Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:43:47Z
    date copyrightJune 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29em%2E1943-7889%2E0000388.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60854
    description abstractRandom fields, such as the wind velocity field and the seismic ground motion field, are usually simulated by the spectral representation method (SRM). The SRM mainly relies on two methods: the random amplitudes method and the random phases method. However, the temporal statistics estimated from one SRM-simulated sample process differs from the target characteristics. Such differences can usually be assessed by the statistical errors, i. e., bias errors and stochastic errors. The closed-form solutions of statistical errors produced by random phases method have been given. This paper gives the closed-form solutions of statistical errors produced by the random phases methods and compares the statistical errors produced by both methods. The comparison of the stochastic errors of power spectral density functions produced by different methods demonstrates that (1) the random amplitudes method exhibits higher but more uniformly distributed stochastic errors than the random phases method; and (2) the stochastic errors produced by the random phases method are dependent on the decomposition method, whereas those produced by the random amplitudes method are not.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleError Assessment for Spectral Representation Method in Random Field Simulation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000379
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian