YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Survey of Motivations, Benefits, and Implementation Challenges of Last Planner System Users

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Jose L.Fernandez-Solis
    ,
    Vishal Porwal
    ,
    Sarel Lavy
    ,
    Ali Shafaat
    ,
    Zofia K. Rybkowski
    ,
    Kiyoung Son
    ,
    Nishi Lagoo
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The number of construction project managers initializing the use of the Last Planner System of Production Control (LPS), an operating system for project management designed to optimize work flow and promote rapid learning, is rapidly increasing, motivated by industry trends and testimonials of its perceived benefits. This study, limited to the building sector, is a systematic literature and testimonial search of the perceived motivations and benefits or challenges for choosing LPS. It substantiates the claims of those perceptions through a structured survey of senior and mid-level managers. Quantitative statistical tools infer that practitioners who use LPS experience more reliable planning, better supply chain integration, and less work flow time. However, managers who directly implement LPS are faced with external resistance from clients and subcontractors, and feel that their organization does not offer the necessary incentives for adopting LPS, indicating a possible clash of paradigms. The case studies and testimonials were available in the literature referenced in the paper, but the survey and the method for analysis are new and have not been published elsewhere, either wholly or in part.
    • Download: (93.36Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Survey of Motivations, Benefits, and Implementation Challenges of Last Planner System Users

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/58774
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJose L.Fernandez-Solis
    contributor authorVishal Porwal
    contributor authorSarel Lavy
    contributor authorAli Shafaat
    contributor authorZofia K. Rybkowski
    contributor authorKiyoung Son
    contributor authorNishi Lagoo
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:52Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:39:52Z
    date copyrightApril 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000614.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58774
    description abstractThe number of construction project managers initializing the use of the Last Planner System of Production Control (LPS), an operating system for project management designed to optimize work flow and promote rapid learning, is rapidly increasing, motivated by industry trends and testimonials of its perceived benefits. This study, limited to the building sector, is a systematic literature and testimonial search of the perceived motivations and benefits or challenges for choosing LPS. It substantiates the claims of those perceptions through a structured survey of senior and mid-level managers. Quantitative statistical tools infer that practitioners who use LPS experience more reliable planning, better supply chain integration, and less work flow time. However, managers who directly implement LPS are faced with external resistance from clients and subcontractors, and feel that their organization does not offer the necessary incentives for adopting LPS, indicating a possible clash of paradigms. The case studies and testimonials were available in the literature referenced in the paper, but the survey and the method for analysis are new and have not been published elsewhere, either wholly or in part.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSurvey of Motivations, Benefits, and Implementation Challenges of Last Planner System Users
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian