YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Production Control Strategy and Duration Variance on Productivity and Work in Process: Simulation-Based Investigation

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Kiarash Hajifathalian
    ,
    Brad W. Wambeke
    ,
    Min Liu
    ,
    Simon M. Hsiang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000517
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Improving productivity and reducing work-in-process are two activities that can improve project performance, but are often difficult to accomplish. The construction process is complex and consists of a large number of interdependent and sequential tasks. Construction activities are simulated as serial production lines, using state- and resource-based simulation of construction processes simulation models, to investigate the effects that different production control strategies (push/pull and balanced/unbalanced) have on productivity and work-in-process. The sensitivity to task duration variance is also examined for different working strategies. Simulation results are used to compare the models based on their performance. In the presence of duration variance, push strategies result in higher productivity, whereas pull strategies result in lower amounts of work-in-process. Pull strategies are more sensitive to the presence of duration variance. Work-in-process is also a function of the coefficient of variance. Simulation results are used to compare the tradeoffs between strategies. The findings will help construction managers better understand the effects of working strategies and conditions to decide which production control strategy is best suited for their needs.
    • Download: (244.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Production Control Strategy and Duration Variance on Productivity and Work in Process: Simulation-Based Investigation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/58679
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKiarash Hajifathalian
    contributor authorBrad W. Wambeke
    contributor authorMin Liu
    contributor authorSimon M. Hsiang
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:43Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:39:43Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000523.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58679
    description abstractImproving productivity and reducing work-in-process are two activities that can improve project performance, but are often difficult to accomplish. The construction process is complex and consists of a large number of interdependent and sequential tasks. Construction activities are simulated as serial production lines, using state- and resource-based simulation of construction processes simulation models, to investigate the effects that different production control strategies (push/pull and balanced/unbalanced) have on productivity and work-in-process. The sensitivity to task duration variance is also examined for different working strategies. Simulation results are used to compare the models based on their performance. In the presence of duration variance, push strategies result in higher productivity, whereas pull strategies result in lower amounts of work-in-process. Pull strategies are more sensitive to the presence of duration variance. Work-in-process is also a function of the coefficient of variance. Simulation results are used to compare the tradeoffs between strategies. The findings will help construction managers better understand the effects of working strategies and conditions to decide which production control strategy is best suited for their needs.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEffects of Production Control Strategy and Duration Variance on Productivity and Work in Process: Simulation-Based Investigation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000517
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian