YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Flagger Illumination during Nighttime Construction and Maintenance Operations

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    John A. Gambatese
    ,
    Sathyanarayanan Rajendran
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000423
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Ensuring the safety of flaggers, motorists, and workers is the primary consideration for flagging operations during nighttime construction and maintenance. A research study was conducted to evaluate four different types of light equipment—a light tower, 12 V spotlight, 12 V high-intensity discharge (HID) floodlight, and balloon lights—with regards to their level of illumination and uniformity over the flagging area and on the flagger’s body. For each type of equipment, three input variables—lamp output, offset angle, and luminaire height—were varied to create a total of 44 different light equipment configurations. Each configuration was evaluated in terms of illumination, uniformity, and visibility in an urban/suburban setting. The study revealed that a light tower with 2,000 W output, 0° offset angle, and raised to a height of 20 feet was the highest ranked type of equipment. However, when ease of use, mobility, and cost were added as output measures, a 12 V spotlight with 0° offset angle and raised to a height of 10 feet received the highest ranking. Smaller light systems are easy to operate and transport, inexpensive, and more applicable for short-term flagging operations and for operations that need to be relocated frequently. Highly ranked configurations were typically those at 0° offset with luminaires elevated to 10 feet or higher. Configurations with higher luminaire heights and lamp outputs from 250 to 2,000 W may perform better depending on the roadway setting, duration of flagging operation, and amount of artificial background lighting.
    • Download: (300.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Flagger Illumination during Nighttime Construction and Maintenance Operations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/58584
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJohn A. Gambatese
    contributor authorSathyanarayanan Rajendran
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:33Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:39:33Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000430.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58584
    description abstractEnsuring the safety of flaggers, motorists, and workers is the primary consideration for flagging operations during nighttime construction and maintenance. A research study was conducted to evaluate four different types of light equipment—a light tower, 12 V spotlight, 12 V high-intensity discharge (HID) floodlight, and balloon lights—with regards to their level of illumination and uniformity over the flagging area and on the flagger’s body. For each type of equipment, three input variables—lamp output, offset angle, and luminaire height—were varied to create a total of 44 different light equipment configurations. Each configuration was evaluated in terms of illumination, uniformity, and visibility in an urban/suburban setting. The study revealed that a light tower with 2,000 W output, 0° offset angle, and raised to a height of 20 feet was the highest ranked type of equipment. However, when ease of use, mobility, and cost were added as output measures, a 12 V spotlight with 0° offset angle and raised to a height of 10 feet received the highest ranking. Smaller light systems are easy to operate and transport, inexpensive, and more applicable for short-term flagging operations and for operations that need to be relocated frequently. Highly ranked configurations were typically those at 0° offset with luminaires elevated to 10 feet or higher. Configurations with higher luminaire heights and lamp outputs from 250 to 2,000 W may perform better depending on the roadway setting, duration of flagging operation, and amount of artificial background lighting.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFlagger Illumination during Nighttime Construction and Maintenance Operations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000423
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian