YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Bottom Flange Confinement Reinforcement in Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Q. Patzlaff
    ,
    G. Morcous
    ,
    K. Hanna
    ,
    M. K. Tadros
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000287
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The AASHTO standard bridge specifications require that nominal reinforcement should be placed to enclose prestressing steel at girder ends for at least a distance equal to the girder’s height. The AASHTO LRFD bridge specifications state that the minimum requirements for this confinement reinforcement is No. 10 (#3) bars at a maximum spacing of 150 mm (6 in.) for at least 1.5 times the girder’s height. Neither standard nor LRFD specifications justify the need for such reinforcement. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of confinement reinforcement on the performance of prestressed concrete bridge girders. Of particular interest is the effect on transfer and development length of prestressing steel and on the shear capacity of prestressed girders. The experimental investigation includes testing the flexural and shear capacities of 610 mm (24 in.) deep T-girders and 1,100 mm (43.3 in.) I-girders. The results indicate that (1) neither the amount or distribution of confinement reinforcement has a significant effect on the transfer length of prestress strands; (2) at the AASHTO calculated development length, the amount of confinement reinforcement does not have significant impact on either the nominal flexural capacity of bridge girders or bond capacity of the prestressing steel, however, the distribution of confinement reinforcement along the entire length of the girder results in improved ductility and reduced cracking under extreme loading conditions; and (3) confinement reinforcement improves the anchorage of strands at girder ends, and consequently, the shear capacity of prestressed girders.
    • Download: (1.490Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Bottom Flange Confinement Reinforcement in Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/56831
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQ. Patzlaff
    contributor authorG. Morcous
    contributor authorK. Hanna
    contributor authorM. K. Tadros
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:35:16Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:35:16Z
    date copyrightJuly 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29be%2E1943-5592%2E0000289.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56831
    description abstractThe AASHTO standard bridge specifications require that nominal reinforcement should be placed to enclose prestressing steel at girder ends for at least a distance equal to the girder’s height. The AASHTO LRFD bridge specifications state that the minimum requirements for this confinement reinforcement is No. 10 (#3) bars at a maximum spacing of 150 mm (6 in.) for at least 1.5 times the girder’s height. Neither standard nor LRFD specifications justify the need for such reinforcement. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of confinement reinforcement on the performance of prestressed concrete bridge girders. Of particular interest is the effect on transfer and development length of prestressing steel and on the shear capacity of prestressed girders. The experimental investigation includes testing the flexural and shear capacities of 610 mm (24 in.) deep T-girders and 1,100 mm (43.3 in.) I-girders. The results indicate that (1) neither the amount or distribution of confinement reinforcement has a significant effect on the transfer length of prestress strands; (2) at the AASHTO calculated development length, the amount of confinement reinforcement does not have significant impact on either the nominal flexural capacity of bridge girders or bond capacity of the prestressing steel, however, the distribution of confinement reinforcement along the entire length of the girder results in improved ductility and reduced cracking under extreme loading conditions; and (3) confinement reinforcement improves the anchorage of strands at girder ends, and consequently, the shear capacity of prestressed girders.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBottom Flange Confinement Reinforcement in Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume17
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000287
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian