YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Analysis of Lean Construction with Design-Build Using a Framework of Contractual Forms of Agreement

    Source: Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 018 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Timothy C. Becker
    ,
    Jennifer S. Shane
    ,
    Edward J. Jalselskis
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000064
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The purpose of this comparative analysis is two-fold: (1) to promote thinking and generate dialogue regarding lean construction within the design and construction community; and (2) to provide this community, including students of lean construction, with a practical, contract language-based framework with which to compare the elements of widely understood design-build with lesser-known lean construction. This comparative analysis explains lean construction thinking through discrete, clause-by-clause comparison of a template integrated project delivery (IPD) agreement (which is a lean construction influenced agreement) with an industry-standard design-build agreement. Comparison identifies numerous contractual topics included in both agreements, labeled universalizing contract topics. Deeper analysis of these identified common topics reveals differing intent and contractual obligations for the parties thereby substantiating insight into the overarching goals for lean construction (LC) and design-build (DB). Next, this paper presents contractual provisions uniquely included in either the LC or DB agreement, labeled differentiating contract topics. Such contract language identifies unique attributes of lean construction and design-build. Additionally, the paper proposes that incorporation of lean construction-related differentiating contract topics in the LC agreement is purposeful to promote the lexicon, processes, and thinking necessary to progress lean construction within the design and construction community.
    • Download: (264.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Analysis of Lean Construction with Design-Build Using a Framework of Contractual Forms of Agreement

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/56067
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTimothy C. Becker
    contributor authorJennifer S. Shane
    contributor authorEdward J. Jalselskis
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:29Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:33:29Z
    date copyrightJune 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000064.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56067
    description abstractThe purpose of this comparative analysis is two-fold: (1) to promote thinking and generate dialogue regarding lean construction within the design and construction community; and (2) to provide this community, including students of lean construction, with a practical, contract language-based framework with which to compare the elements of widely understood design-build with lesser-known lean construction. This comparative analysis explains lean construction thinking through discrete, clause-by-clause comparison of a template integrated project delivery (IPD) agreement (which is a lean construction influenced agreement) with an industry-standard design-build agreement. Comparison identifies numerous contractual topics included in both agreements, labeled universalizing contract topics. Deeper analysis of these identified common topics reveals differing intent and contractual obligations for the parties thereby substantiating insight into the overarching goals for lean construction (LC) and design-build (DB). Next, this paper presents contractual provisions uniquely included in either the LC or DB agreement, labeled differentiating contract topics. Such contract language identifies unique attributes of lean construction and design-build. Additionally, the paper proposes that incorporation of lean construction-related differentiating contract topics in the LC agreement is purposeful to promote the lexicon, processes, and thinking necessary to progress lean construction within the design and construction community.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparative Analysis of Lean Construction with Design-Build Using a Framework of Contractual Forms of Agreement
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume18
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000064
    treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 018 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian