YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Leadership and Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Leadership and Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Civil Engineering Crisis

    Source: Leadership and Management in Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Tomasz Arciszewski
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2006)6:1(26)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper addresses the issue of a crisis in civil engineering. In the past, civil engineers were pioneers of our civilization; today, they are rarely perceived as leaders and innovators. The author urges civil engineers to use the present challenges to change and adapt the profession to new demands in order to regain engineering’s leadership. The process of globalization is briefly discussed as an important component of the present situation. Next, the concept of the twenty-first-century civil engineer as a modern reincarnation of the “Renaissance man” with a focus on engineering creativity, computing, and globalization is proposed. The proposed twenty-first-century civil engineer is characterized by his/her body of knowledge (BOK) with five major components: civil engineering factual knowledge, analytical knowledge and skills, engineering creativity knowledge and skills, computing knowledge and skills, and globalization knowledge and skills. The author recommends that the BOK be balanced in terms of qualitative and quantitative knowledge. The teaching of engineering creativity, computing, and globalization is also discussed. In conclusion, a paradigm change is proposed from the present quantitative teaching paradigm to a new, balanced paradigm, which would provide evenhanded instruction on both qualitative and quantitative knowledge.
    • Download: (75.77Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Civil Engineering Crisis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/55389
    Collections
    • Leadership and Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTomasz Arciszewski
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:24Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:32:24Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%291532-6748%282006%296%3A1%2826%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55389
    description abstractThis paper addresses the issue of a crisis in civil engineering. In the past, civil engineers were pioneers of our civilization; today, they are rarely perceived as leaders and innovators. The author urges civil engineers to use the present challenges to change and adapt the profession to new demands in order to regain engineering’s leadership. The process of globalization is briefly discussed as an important component of the present situation. Next, the concept of the twenty-first-century civil engineer as a modern reincarnation of the “Renaissance man” with a focus on engineering creativity, computing, and globalization is proposed. The proposed twenty-first-century civil engineer is characterized by his/her body of knowledge (BOK) with five major components: civil engineering factual knowledge, analytical knowledge and skills, engineering creativity knowledge and skills, computing knowledge and skills, and globalization knowledge and skills. The author recommends that the BOK be balanced in terms of qualitative and quantitative knowledge. The teaching of engineering creativity, computing, and globalization is also discussed. In conclusion, a paradigm change is proposed from the present quantitative teaching paradigm to a new, balanced paradigm, which would provide evenhanded instruction on both qualitative and quantitative knowledge.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCivil Engineering Crisis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue1
    journal titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2006)6:1(26)
    treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian