YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Two-Phase, Two-Stage, and Single-Stage Anaerobic Process Comparison

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Nuri Azbar
    ,
    Richard E. Speece
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:3(240)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this research, three anaerobic process configurations—namely, two-phase dual sludge (TPDS), two-stage single sludge (TSSS), and single-stage—were evaluated for effluent COD concentration. The same temperature, SRT, and glucose substrate were used in all experiments. In every case, TPDS and TSSS configurations significantly outperformed the single stage. All experiments were carried out at a temperature of 35°C, and all reactors were operated as daily fill-and-draw with HRT = SRT. The following ranges for each design parameter were studied: pH (4.5, 5.5, and 6.5); first stage HRT (3, 8, and 24 h); and floc load (3, 9, and 27 gCOD/gVSS). The overall HRT/SRT of all systems was 30 days, and a pH-Stat system was used to control the pH in the acidification reactors at the desired value. Statistical evaluation of the results indicated that a floc load of 3 in the first reactor of TPDS yielded the lowest effluent COD concentrations under the studied range of parameters, while for the TSSS reactor configuration the staging of the system itself was the controlling phenomena responsible for reduced effluent COD.
    • Download: (164.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Two-Phase, Two-Stage, and Single-Stage Anaerobic Process Comparison

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/55131
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNuri Azbar
    contributor authorRichard E. Speece
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:04Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:32:04Z
    date copyrightMarch 2001
    date issued2001
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282001%29127%3A3%28240%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55131
    description abstractIn this research, three anaerobic process configurations—namely, two-phase dual sludge (TPDS), two-stage single sludge (TSSS), and single-stage—were evaluated for effluent COD concentration. The same temperature, SRT, and glucose substrate were used in all experiments. In every case, TPDS and TSSS configurations significantly outperformed the single stage. All experiments were carried out at a temperature of 35°C, and all reactors were operated as daily fill-and-draw with HRT = SRT. The following ranges for each design parameter were studied: pH (4.5, 5.5, and 6.5); first stage HRT (3, 8, and 24 h); and floc load (3, 9, and 27 gCOD/gVSS). The overall HRT/SRT of all systems was 30 days, and a pH-Stat system was used to control the pH in the acidification reactors at the desired value. Statistical evaluation of the results indicated that a floc load of 3 in the first reactor of TPDS yielded the lowest effluent COD concentrations under the studied range of parameters, while for the TSSS reactor configuration the staging of the system itself was the controlling phenomena responsible for reduced effluent COD.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleTwo-Phase, Two-Stage, and Single-Stage Anaerobic Process Comparison
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume127
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:3(240)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian