YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    When Natural and Technological Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999

    Source: Natural Hazards Review:;2004:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Laura J. Steinberg
    ,
    Ana Maria Cruz
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(121)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Analysis of the effects of strong earthquakes on hazardous materials stored at industrial facilities in urban areas can provide valuable insights for future risk management practice. In this study, the experience of the heavily industrialized Kocaeli region of Turkey after the August 17, 1999, earthquake is reviewed. Nineteen industrial facilities are investigated. Some of the more catastrophic examples of hazardous materials releases investigated include these: the intentional release of 200,000 kg of hazardous anhydrous ammonia at a fertilizer plant; the leakage of 6.5 million kg of toxic acrylonitrile into air, soil, and water from ruptured tanks at a chemical company; and the enormous fires in the crude oil unit and naphtha tank farm, and liquid petroleum gas leakages and oil spills at the port terminal at an oil refinery. [This research shows that joint earthquake-technological disasters can be mitigated by creating chemical release emergency response plans which specifically incorporate conditions that typically follow a major earthquake. These plans would include consideration of the potential unavailability of water, electricity, and key response personnel; design of chemical release mitigation systems that can withstand earthquake forces; land use planning to prevent citizens from living within high-risk areas and seismic-resistant design and construction of tanks and piping containing hazardous materials.]
    • Download: (106.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      When Natural and Technological Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/54745
    Collections
    • Natural Hazards Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLaura J. Steinberg
    contributor authorAna Maria Cruz
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:24Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:31:24Z
    date copyrightAugust 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%291527-6988%282004%295%3A3%28121%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54745
    description abstractAnalysis of the effects of strong earthquakes on hazardous materials stored at industrial facilities in urban areas can provide valuable insights for future risk management practice. In this study, the experience of the heavily industrialized Kocaeli region of Turkey after the August 17, 1999, earthquake is reviewed. Nineteen industrial facilities are investigated. Some of the more catastrophic examples of hazardous materials releases investigated include these: the intentional release of 200,000 kg of hazardous anhydrous ammonia at a fertilizer plant; the leakage of 6.5 million kg of toxic acrylonitrile into air, soil, and water from ruptured tanks at a chemical company; and the enormous fires in the crude oil unit and naphtha tank farm, and liquid petroleum gas leakages and oil spills at the port terminal at an oil refinery. [This research shows that joint earthquake-technological disasters can be mitigated by creating chemical release emergency response plans which specifically incorporate conditions that typically follow a major earthquake. These plans would include consideration of the potential unavailability of water, electricity, and key response personnel; design of chemical release mitigation systems that can withstand earthquake forces; land use planning to prevent citizens from living within high-risk areas and seismic-resistant design and construction of tanks and piping containing hazardous materials.]
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleWhen Natural and Technological Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue3
    journal titleNatural Hazards Review
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(121)
    treeNatural Hazards Review:;2004:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian