Show simple item record

contributor authorZhongjie Zhang
contributor authorMingjiang Tao
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:29:09Z
date available2017-05-08T21:29:09Z
date copyrightFebruary 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%291090-0241%282008%29134%3A2%28203%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53288
description abstractThree testing methods for predicting the durability of cement-stabilized soils—the tube suction (TS), 7-day unconfined compression strength (UCS), and wetting–drying durability tests—were tested and compared for their correlations and influence factors using a problematic low plastic silt clay from subgrade commonly encountered in Louisiana. A series of samples was molded at six different cement dosages (2.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5, and 12.5% by dry weight of the soil) and four different molding moisture contents (15.5, 18.5, 21.5, and 24.5%). The test results indicate that the water–cement ratio of cement-stabilized soil had the dominant influence on the maximum dielectric value (DV), 7-day UCS, and durability of stabilized samples tested, although the dry unit weight of cement-stabilized soil could cause the variation of the results. This study confirms that TS, 7-day UCS, and wetting-drying durability tests are equivalent in predicting durability, and tentative charts to ensuring the durability of cement-stabilized low plasticity soils are developed using their 7-day UCS or the maximum DV values.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDurability of Cement Stabilized Low Plasticity Soils
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:2(203)
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record