Show simple item record

contributor authorRobert V. Whitman
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:27:01Z
date available2017-05-08T21:27:01Z
date copyrightJuly 2000
date issued2000
identifier other%28asce%291090-0241%282000%29126%3A7%28583%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/51912
description abstractProbabilistic methods are potentially useful in four stages of a typical project: site characterization and evaluation, evaluation of designs, decision making, and construction control. In evaluation of projects, it can be useful to express risk numerically. When uncertainties can be quantified and model errors are understood, reliability theory may be used. Event-tree analysis can be a framework for effectively applying judgment concerning uncertainty. The use of quantified risk in decision making is limited by standards for acceptable risk; good communication with a client is essential. Unless clients or regulators are interested in quantifying risks as part of decision making, engineers will continue to rely on traditional methods. When risks are large and the costs of absolute safety are large, clients are interested in discussing risks. Issues concerning the adequacy of existing structures such as earth dams are stimulating interest in risk assessment, and there will be spin-off from developments in earthquake engineering. More and better examples of applications of probabilistic methods are needed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleOrganizing and Evaluating Uncertainty in Geotechnical Engineering
typeJournal Paper
journal volume126
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:7(583)
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record