YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Live-Load Distribution Factors in Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Paul J. Barr
    ,
    Marc O. Eberhard
    ,
    John F. Stanton
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(298)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper presents an evaluation of flexural live-load distribution factors for a series of three-span prestressed concrete girder bridges. The response of one bridge, measured during a static live-load test, was used to evaluate the reliability of a finite-element model scheme. Twenty-four variations of this model were then used to evaluate the procedures for computing flexural live-load distribution factors that are embodied in three bridge design codes. The finite-element models were also used to investigate the effects that lifts, intermediate diaphragms, end diaphragms, continuity, skew angle, and load type have on distribution factors. For geometries similar to those considered in the development of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications, the distribution factors computed with the finite-element models were within 6% of the code values. However, for the geometry of the bridge that was tested, the discrepancy was 28%. Lifts, end diaphragms, skew angle, and load type significantly decreased the distribution factors, while continuity and intermediate diaphragms had the least effect. If the bridge had been designed using the distribution factors calculated with the finite-element model rather than the code values, the required concrete release strength could have been reduced by 6.9 MPa (1,000 psi) or the live load could have been increased by 39%.
    • Download: (169.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Live-Load Distribution Factors in Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/50559
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPaul J. Barr
    contributor authorMarc O. Eberhard
    contributor authorJohn F. Stanton
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:24:54Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:24:54Z
    date copyrightOctober 2001
    date issued2001
    identifier other%28asce%291084-0702%282001%296%3A5%28298%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50559
    description abstractThis paper presents an evaluation of flexural live-load distribution factors for a series of three-span prestressed concrete girder bridges. The response of one bridge, measured during a static live-load test, was used to evaluate the reliability of a finite-element model scheme. Twenty-four variations of this model were then used to evaluate the procedures for computing flexural live-load distribution factors that are embodied in three bridge design codes. The finite-element models were also used to investigate the effects that lifts, intermediate diaphragms, end diaphragms, continuity, skew angle, and load type have on distribution factors. For geometries similar to those considered in the development of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications, the distribution factors computed with the finite-element models were within 6% of the code values. However, for the geometry of the bridge that was tested, the discrepancy was 28%. Lifts, end diaphragms, skew angle, and load type significantly decreased the distribution factors, while continuity and intermediate diaphragms had the least effect. If the bridge had been designed using the distribution factors calculated with the finite-element model rather than the code values, the required concrete release strength could have been reduced by 6.9 MPa (1,000 psi) or the live load could have been increased by 39%.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLive-Load Distribution Factors in Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(298)
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian