Indicator Generalized Parameterization for Interpolation Point Selection in Groundwater Inverse ModelingSource: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 003Author:Frank T.-C. Tsai
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:3(233)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This study developed an indicator generalized parameterization (IGP) method to cope with the problem of selecting interpolation points in estimating hydraulic conductivity fields. The IGP method introduced data indicators and d-neighborhoods to describe the actual contribution of sample data to unsampled locations. Moreover, the IGP method was applied to nonkriging basis functions to characterize spatially correlated hydraulic conductivity. This study used probabilistic data indicators to take into consideration the randomness and heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity. The groundwater inverse method, along with an adjoint state method, was adopted to estimate the indicator probabilities. Then a cutoff was applied to determine the values of the data indicators for the IGP to estimate hydraulic conductivity. The numerical example validated the IGP and illustrated the significance of selecting interpolation points for hydraulic conductivity distributions. Further, the study demonstrated the IGP applicability to estimating hydraulic conductivity in the Alamitos Gap area, Calif. It was concluded that increasing the amount of data selected for interpolation results in smaller conditional variances, but causes the ensuing distribution to be smoother. However, smooth distributions of hydraulic conductivity may not be preferred. Proper selection of interpolation points can result in better hydraulic conductivity distributions for groundwater modeling purposes.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Frank T.-C. Tsai | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:24:30Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:24:30Z | |
date copyright | March 2009 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier other | %28asce%291084-0699%282009%2914%3A3%28233%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50305 | |
description abstract | This study developed an indicator generalized parameterization (IGP) method to cope with the problem of selecting interpolation points in estimating hydraulic conductivity fields. The IGP method introduced data indicators and d-neighborhoods to describe the actual contribution of sample data to unsampled locations. Moreover, the IGP method was applied to nonkriging basis functions to characterize spatially correlated hydraulic conductivity. This study used probabilistic data indicators to take into consideration the randomness and heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity. The groundwater inverse method, along with an adjoint state method, was adopted to estimate the indicator probabilities. Then a cutoff was applied to determine the values of the data indicators for the IGP to estimate hydraulic conductivity. The numerical example validated the IGP and illustrated the significance of selecting interpolation points for hydraulic conductivity distributions. Further, the study demonstrated the IGP applicability to estimating hydraulic conductivity in the Alamitos Gap area, Calif. It was concluded that increasing the amount of data selected for interpolation results in smaller conditional variances, but causes the ensuing distribution to be smoother. However, smooth distributions of hydraulic conductivity may not be preferred. Proper selection of interpolation points can result in better hydraulic conductivity distributions for groundwater modeling purposes. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Indicator Generalized Parameterization for Interpolation Point Selection in Groundwater Inverse Modeling | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 14 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:3(233) | |
tree | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |