YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Flux-Based Alternative Formulation for Variably Saturated Subsurface Flow

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Rashid Bashir
    ,
    Dieter F. Stolle
    ,
    James E. Smith
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:5(501)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Finite-element and finite-difference solutions to different forms of the Richards equation can exhibit stability problems as well as mass balance errors. These problems are more pronounced for sharp wetting fronts in soils with very dry initial conditions and at material interfaces for layered soil profiles. The pressure head form can suffer from large mass balance errors while the moisture content form conserves mass perfectly but has difficulty handling material boundaries in layered soil profiles and near saturation conditions. This paper presents a conservative mixed formulation for the solution of the Richards equation of unsaturated flow by the finite-element method in which the discharge velocity (volumetric flux) and pressure head are the primary field variables. Solution techniques for various boundary conditions including prescribed constant pressure head and constant flux are also presented. The ability of the formulation to handle variably saturated domain and material heterogeneity is also established. Example solutions for infiltration into homogeneous and heterogeneous unsaturated and variably saturated soil profiles are compared with finite-element and finite-difference solutions of pressure head and mixed form of Richards equation. Results indicate that the alternative formulation is mass conservative, stable, and can better handle heterogeneous boundaries and variably saturated flow domains.
    • Download: (195.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Flux-Based Alternative Formulation for Variably Saturated Subsurface Flow

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/50062
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRashid Bashir
    contributor authorDieter F. Stolle
    contributor authorJames E. Smith
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:24:07Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:24:07Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282007%2912%3A5%28501%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50062
    description abstractFinite-element and finite-difference solutions to different forms of the Richards equation can exhibit stability problems as well as mass balance errors. These problems are more pronounced for sharp wetting fronts in soils with very dry initial conditions and at material interfaces for layered soil profiles. The pressure head form can suffer from large mass balance errors while the moisture content form conserves mass perfectly but has difficulty handling material boundaries in layered soil profiles and near saturation conditions. This paper presents a conservative mixed formulation for the solution of the Richards equation of unsaturated flow by the finite-element method in which the discharge velocity (volumetric flux) and pressure head are the primary field variables. Solution techniques for various boundary conditions including prescribed constant pressure head and constant flux are also presented. The ability of the formulation to handle variably saturated domain and material heterogeneity is also established. Example solutions for infiltration into homogeneous and heterogeneous unsaturated and variably saturated soil profiles are compared with finite-element and finite-difference solutions of pressure head and mixed form of Richards equation. Results indicate that the alternative formulation is mass conservative, stable, and can better handle heterogeneous boundaries and variably saturated flow domains.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFlux-Based Alternative Formulation for Variably Saturated Subsurface Flow
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:5(501)
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian