YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Precipitation-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks and Conceptual Models

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    A. Sezin Tokar
    ,
    Momcilo Markus
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(156)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Inspired by the functioning of the brain and biological nervous systems, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been applied to various hydrologic problems in the last 10 years. In this study, ANN models are compared with traditional conceptual models in predicting watershed runoff as a function of rainfall, snow water equivalent, and temperature. The ANN technique was applied to model watershed runoff in three basins with different climatic and physiographic characteristics—the Fraser River in Colorado, Raccoon Creek in Iowa, and Little Patuxent River in Maryland. In the Fraser River watershed, the ANN technique was applied to model monthly streamflow and was compared to a conceptual water balance (Watbal) model. The ANN technique was used to model the daily rainfall-runoff process and was compared to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting (SAC-SMA) model in the Raccoon River watershed. The daily rainfall-runoff process was also modeled using the ANN technique in the Little Patuxent River basin, and the training and testing results were compared to those of a simple conceptual rainfall-runoff (SCRR) model. In all cases, the ANN models provided higher accuracy, a more systematic approach, and shortened the time spent in training of the models. For the Fraser River, the accuracy of monthly streamflow forecasts by the ANN model was significantly higher compared to the accuracy of the Watbal model. The best-fit ANN model performed as well as the SAC-SMA model in the Raccoon River. The testing and training accuracy of the ANN model in Little Patuxent River was comparatively higher than that of the SCRR model. The initial results indicate that ANNs can be powerful tools in modeling the precipitation-runoff process for various time scales, topography, and climate patterns.
    • Download: (74.81Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Precipitation-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks and Conceptual Models

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/49512
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. Sezin Tokar
    contributor authorMomcilo Markus
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:20Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:23:20Z
    date copyrightApril 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282000%295%3A2%28156%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49512
    description abstractInspired by the functioning of the brain and biological nervous systems, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been applied to various hydrologic problems in the last 10 years. In this study, ANN models are compared with traditional conceptual models in predicting watershed runoff as a function of rainfall, snow water equivalent, and temperature. The ANN technique was applied to model watershed runoff in three basins with different climatic and physiographic characteristics—the Fraser River in Colorado, Raccoon Creek in Iowa, and Little Patuxent River in Maryland. In the Fraser River watershed, the ANN technique was applied to model monthly streamflow and was compared to a conceptual water balance (Watbal) model. The ANN technique was used to model the daily rainfall-runoff process and was compared to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting (SAC-SMA) model in the Raccoon River watershed. The daily rainfall-runoff process was also modeled using the ANN technique in the Little Patuxent River basin, and the training and testing results were compared to those of a simple conceptual rainfall-runoff (SCRR) model. In all cases, the ANN models provided higher accuracy, a more systematic approach, and shortened the time spent in training of the models. For the Fraser River, the accuracy of monthly streamflow forecasts by the ANN model was significantly higher compared to the accuracy of the Watbal model. The best-fit ANN model performed as well as the SAC-SMA model in the Raccoon River. The testing and training accuracy of the ANN model in Little Patuxent River was comparatively higher than that of the SCRR model. The initial results indicate that ANNs can be powerful tools in modeling the precipitation-runoff process for various time scales, topography, and climate patterns.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePrecipitation-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks and Conceptual Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(156)
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian