YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Overview of Earthquake Resisting System Design and Retrofit Strategy for Bridges in Illinois

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2008:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Daniel H. Tobias
    ,
    Ralph E. Anderson
    ,
    Chad E. Hodel
    ,
    William M. Kramer
    ,
    Riyad M. Wahab
    ,
    Richard J. Chaput
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(147)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: An overview of an earthquake resisting system (ERS) strategy for the design and retrofit of bridges in Illinois is presented in the paper. Initial development of this ERS strategy by the Illinois Dept. of Transportation (IDOT) began in mid-2005. It was initially implemented in late 2006 and revised in late 2007 to reflect increased design accelerations adopted into the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official’s bridge design code and a new seismic bridge design guide specification in mid-2007. The primary objective of IDOT’s ERS strategy is to prevent span loss. This is achieved through three levels or tiers of seismic structural redundancy, which allow for certain levels of damage at planned locations in bridges. Controlled damage at strategic locations in structures allows for the mitigation of seismic energy. Sacrificial or fuse-like connections between superstructures and substructures, conservative beam support lengths, and plastic hinging at planned locations in substructures are the primary areas of focus for Levels 1–3 of seismic structural redundancy, respectively, in Illinois’ developed ERS strategy.
    • Download: (599.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Overview of Earthquake Resisting System Design and Retrofit Strategy for Bridges in Illinois

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/49299
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDaniel H. Tobias
    contributor authorRalph E. Anderson
    contributor authorChad E. Hodel
    contributor authorWilliam M. Kramer
    contributor authorRiyad M. Wahab
    contributor authorRichard J. Chaput
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:01Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:23:01Z
    date copyrightAugust 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier other%28asce%291084-0680%282008%2913%3A3%28147%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49299
    description abstractAn overview of an earthquake resisting system (ERS) strategy for the design and retrofit of bridges in Illinois is presented in the paper. Initial development of this ERS strategy by the Illinois Dept. of Transportation (IDOT) began in mid-2005. It was initially implemented in late 2006 and revised in late 2007 to reflect increased design accelerations adopted into the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official’s bridge design code and a new seismic bridge design guide specification in mid-2007. The primary objective of IDOT’s ERS strategy is to prevent span loss. This is achieved through three levels or tiers of seismic structural redundancy, which allow for certain levels of damage at planned locations in bridges. Controlled damage at strategic locations in structures allows for the mitigation of seismic energy. Sacrificial or fuse-like connections between superstructures and substructures, conservative beam support lengths, and plastic hinging at planned locations in substructures are the primary areas of focus for Levels 1–3 of seismic structural redundancy, respectively, in Illinois’ developed ERS strategy.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOverview of Earthquake Resisting System Design and Retrofit Strategy for Bridges in Illinois
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue3
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(147)
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2008:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian