YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Practical Approach to Designing Wood Roof Truss Assemblies

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2008:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Rakesh Gupta
    ,
    Pranueng Limkatanyoo
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(135)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The objective of this research was to use a three-dimensional (3D) analysis method to evaluate “system effects” in light-frame roof truss assemblies. The goal of this study was to develop an improved and practical design method for 3D roof truss assemblies used in residential construction. A truss plate manufacturer (TPM) design software was used to lay out assemblies and to design individual trusses. The TPM software used a conventional design procedure (CDP) by analyzing one truss at a time in two dimensions. A commercially available structural analysis program was utilized to model and analyze 3D truss assemblies as a system. This system design procedure (SDP) is being proposed as a tool to analyze and design 3D roof truss assemblies. Three truss assemblies, L shape, T shape, and a complex assembly, were analyzed. The structural responses including combined stress index (CSI), truss deflections, and reactions from both CDP and SDP were compared and the system effects were evaluated. From this investigation, it is concluded that there are three system effects observed by the SDP, but not accounted for by CDP. These are: reduced applied load effect, truss-to-truss support effect, and stiff truss effect. Based on this investigation, the maximum CSI for most trusses in all three assemblies reduced by 6–60% because of system effects. SDP can help to improve the design of truss assemblies by directly including system effects that are not accounted for by the CDP.
    • Download: (1.067Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Practical Approach to Designing Wood Roof Truss Assemblies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/49297
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRakesh Gupta
    contributor authorPranueng Limkatanyoo
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:23:00Z
    date copyrightAugust 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier other%28asce%291084-0680%282008%2913%3A3%28135%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49297
    description abstractThe objective of this research was to use a three-dimensional (3D) analysis method to evaluate “system effects” in light-frame roof truss assemblies. The goal of this study was to develop an improved and practical design method for 3D roof truss assemblies used in residential construction. A truss plate manufacturer (TPM) design software was used to lay out assemblies and to design individual trusses. The TPM software used a conventional design procedure (CDP) by analyzing one truss at a time in two dimensions. A commercially available structural analysis program was utilized to model and analyze 3D truss assemblies as a system. This system design procedure (SDP) is being proposed as a tool to analyze and design 3D roof truss assemblies. Three truss assemblies, L shape, T shape, and a complex assembly, were analyzed. The structural responses including combined stress index (CSI), truss deflections, and reactions from both CDP and SDP were compared and the system effects were evaluated. From this investigation, it is concluded that there are three system effects observed by the SDP, but not accounted for by CDP. These are: reduced applied load effect, truss-to-truss support effect, and stiff truss effect. Based on this investigation, the maximum CSI for most trusses in all three assemblies reduced by 6–60% because of system effects. SDP can help to improve the design of truss assemblies by directly including system effects that are not accounted for by the CDP.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePractical Approach to Designing Wood Roof Truss Assemblies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue3
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(135)
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2008:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian