Understanding Capacity Rating of Bridges from Load Tests

Abstract

The paper discusses a few issues related to capacity rating of existing bridges using field test results. The principles of proof and diagnostic load tests for capacity evaluation are presented through discussing the rating formulas for both tests. The proof load rating is proven a lower bound method. The diagnostic rating is proven the same as linear extrapolation, meaning an upper bound approach in nature. Two different methods used in the literature in calculating load distribution factors are discussed. The two methods are proven theoretically equal in an ideal case, but could be significantly different for field bridges due to the effects of many field factors. To distinguish the two methods, one is defined as load distribution factor (LDF) and the other as girder distribution factor (GDF). An example is used to demonstrate the discussions. The results indicate that, on one hand, the measured LDF, though calculated from measured strains, cannot fully reflect the capacity conditions of field bridges. It reflects only a relative load distribution among girders. On the other hand, the GDF approach may overestimate the bridge capacity, because it includes all the beneficial effects. Some beneficial effects may not be reliable for ultimate capacity and thus need to be removed from the capacity rating.