| contributor author | Abdulaziz A. Bubshait | |
| contributor author | Michael J. Cunningham | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:22:28Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:22:28Z | |
| date copyright | November 1998 | |
| date issued | 1998 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291084-0680%281998%293%3A4%28176%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48938 | |
| description abstract | Construction project delays may result from many circumstances. Negotiating a fair and timely damage settlement is beneficial to all parties. Network-based scheduling is an excellent way for negotiating settlement of changes, disputes, and delays throughout the project. In the construction industry, however, there is no single standard and no “accepted” procedure to determine impact of schedule delays. This paper suggests a practice for evaluating schedule impact. The practice allows available float to be shared by both the owner and the contractor. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Determining Schedule Impact: Working Practice | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 3 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:4(176) | |
| tree | Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;1998:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |