YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Decision Methodology for Allocating Funds across Transportation Infrastructure Assets

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Nasir G. Gharaibeh
    ,
    Yi-Chang Chiu
    ,
    Patrick L. Gurian
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(1)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: One of the main activities in transportation infrastructure asset management is the allocation of available funds across infrastructure classes (e.g., pavements, bridges, signs) or programs (e.g., maintenance, construction). A methodology for allocating funds across transportation asset classes using multiattribute utility theory has been developed and is provided in this paper. This methodology can be used for performing trade-off analysis among asset classes where it is practical to consider potential shifts in funding from one class to another. The methodology was applied to a sample state highway network in Champaign County, Illinois. The sample highway network consists of pavements, bridges, culverts, signs, and intersections. Four funding allocation alternatives were evaluated using the developed methodology. The case study identified the funding allocation alternative that results in the lowest risk of infrastructure failure or poor performance (i.e., highest utility) from an experienced engineer standpoint. The utility analysis revealed that the decision maker in the case study is risk averse when managing infrastructure classes with the most potential to affect traffic safety and to be noticed by the public, such as bridges and intersections. The case study also revealed that the level of available funding and the level of infrastructure performance affect how the total funding is allocated among asset classes.
    • Download: (230.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Decision Methodology for Allocating Funds across Transportation Infrastructure Assets

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/48248
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNasir G. Gharaibeh
    contributor authorYi-Chang Chiu
    contributor authorPatrick L. Gurian
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:25Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:21:25Z
    date copyrightMarch 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%282006%2912%3A1%281%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48248
    description abstractOne of the main activities in transportation infrastructure asset management is the allocation of available funds across infrastructure classes (e.g., pavements, bridges, signs) or programs (e.g., maintenance, construction). A methodology for allocating funds across transportation asset classes using multiattribute utility theory has been developed and is provided in this paper. This methodology can be used for performing trade-off analysis among asset classes where it is practical to consider potential shifts in funding from one class to another. The methodology was applied to a sample state highway network in Champaign County, Illinois. The sample highway network consists of pavements, bridges, culverts, signs, and intersections. Four funding allocation alternatives were evaluated using the developed methodology. The case study identified the funding allocation alternative that results in the lowest risk of infrastructure failure or poor performance (i.e., highest utility) from an experienced engineer standpoint. The utility analysis revealed that the decision maker in the case study is risk averse when managing infrastructure classes with the most potential to affect traffic safety and to be noticed by the public, such as bridges and intersections. The case study also revealed that the level of available funding and the level of infrastructure performance affect how the total funding is allocated among asset classes.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDecision Methodology for Allocating Funds across Transportation Infrastructure Assets
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(1)
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian