YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Scheduling Inspection and Renewal of Large Infrastructure Assets

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2001:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Yehuda Kleiner
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(136)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: A decision framework is introduced to assist municipal engineers and planners to optimize decisions regarding the renewal of large infrastructure assets such as water transmission pipes, trunk sewers, or other assets with high costs of failure, inspection, and condition assessment. The proposed decision framework identifies a need for immediate intervention or, alternatively, enables optimization of the scheduling of the next inspection and condition assessment. The deterioration of the asset is modeled as a semi-Markov process and is thereby discretized into condition states. The waiting times in each state are assumed to be random variables with “known” probability distributions. If pertinent data are scarce (as is typical in most municipalities) these probability distributions can be initially derived based on expert opinion. These distributions will then be continually updated as observed deterioration data are collected over time. Monte Carlo simulation is used to calculate the distributions of the cumulative waiting times. Conditional survival probabilities are used to compile age-dependent transition probability matrices in the various states. The expected discounted total cost associated with an asset (including cost of intervention, inspection, and failure) is computed as a function of time. The time to schedule the next inspection/condition assessment is when the total expected discounted cost is minimum. Immediate intervention should be planned if the time of minimum cost is less than a threshold period (2 to 3 years) away. A computer program is prepared for demonstration and proof of concept. The decision framework lends itself to a computer application fairly easily. Although usable in its current form, this paper identifies some issues that require as yet unavailable data as well as more research in order to develop the framework into a comprehensive application tool.
    • Download: (178.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Scheduling Inspection and Renewal of Large Infrastructure Assets

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/48145
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYehuda Kleiner
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:14Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:21:14Z
    date copyrightDecember 2001
    date issued2001
    identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%282001%297%3A4%28136%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48145
    description abstractA decision framework is introduced to assist municipal engineers and planners to optimize decisions regarding the renewal of large infrastructure assets such as water transmission pipes, trunk sewers, or other assets with high costs of failure, inspection, and condition assessment. The proposed decision framework identifies a need for immediate intervention or, alternatively, enables optimization of the scheduling of the next inspection and condition assessment. The deterioration of the asset is modeled as a semi-Markov process and is thereby discretized into condition states. The waiting times in each state are assumed to be random variables with “known” probability distributions. If pertinent data are scarce (as is typical in most municipalities) these probability distributions can be initially derived based on expert opinion. These distributions will then be continually updated as observed deterioration data are collected over time. Monte Carlo simulation is used to calculate the distributions of the cumulative waiting times. Conditional survival probabilities are used to compile age-dependent transition probability matrices in the various states. The expected discounted total cost associated with an asset (including cost of intervention, inspection, and failure) is computed as a function of time. The time to schedule the next inspection/condition assessment is when the total expected discounted cost is minimum. Immediate intervention should be planned if the time of minimum cost is less than a threshold period (2 to 3 years) away. A computer program is prepared for demonstration and proof of concept. The decision framework lends itself to a computer application fairly easily. Although usable in its current form, this paper identifies some issues that require as yet unavailable data as well as more research in order to develop the framework into a comprehensive application tool.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleScheduling Inspection and Renewal of Large Infrastructure Assets
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(136)
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2001:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian