YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Liquidated Damages: Review of Current State of the Practice

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    L. G. Crowley
    ,
    W. C. Zech
    ,
    C. Bailey
    ,
    P. Gujar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:4(383)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Liquidated damages (LDs) are contractually specified damages that provide restitution for additional owner costs incurred from contractor delayed completion. Established legal precedence requires owners to specify rates that are a good faith pre-estimate of actual anticipated damages. Additionally, the Federal Highway Administration provides guidance to state highway agencies (SHAs) in developing these rates. In reviewing current practices, SHAs were surveyed about individual LD practices utilized. Survey results are divided into three categories for discussion purposes: (1) contractual practices; (2) estimating practices; and (3) administrative practices. All SHAs chose to recover damages through a contractual LD clause although implementation varies. SHA estimating practices are generally not detailed and tend to place rates at the low end of actual damages. Few SHAs verify estimated rates with actual project cost experiences. Administrative practices have field personnel administering the primary element of the LD clause, contract time. These practices also reveal a high priority on contract closeout, sometimes sacrificing LD amounts due by contractors under contract. Few states have experienced legal challenges regarding their LDs provision.
    • Download: (230.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Liquidated Damages: Review of Current State of the Practice

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47946
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorL. G. Crowley
    contributor authorW. C. Zech
    contributor authorC. Bailey
    contributor authorP. Gujar
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:20:56Z
    date copyrightOctober 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282008%29134%3A4%28383%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47946
    description abstractLiquidated damages (LDs) are contractually specified damages that provide restitution for additional owner costs incurred from contractor delayed completion. Established legal precedence requires owners to specify rates that are a good faith pre-estimate of actual anticipated damages. Additionally, the Federal Highway Administration provides guidance to state highway agencies (SHAs) in developing these rates. In reviewing current practices, SHAs were surveyed about individual LD practices utilized. Survey results are divided into three categories for discussion purposes: (1) contractual practices; (2) estimating practices; and (3) administrative practices. All SHAs chose to recover damages through a contractual LD clause although implementation varies. SHA estimating practices are generally not detailed and tend to place rates at the low end of actual damages. Few SHAs verify estimated rates with actual project cost experiences. Administrative practices have field personnel administering the primary element of the LD clause, contract time. These practices also reveal a high priority on contract closeout, sometimes sacrificing LD amounts due by contractors under contract. Few states have experienced legal challenges regarding their LDs provision.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLiquidated Damages: Review of Current State of the Practice
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:4(383)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian