Engineer’s Liability Considerations in Specifying Corrugated High Density Polyethylene PipeSource: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 001Author:Patricia D. Galloway
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(87)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The engineer’s role in any design project is to design a project that meets the desired purpose, is constructible, and the health, safety, and welfare of the user is protected. Yet engineers do not always recognize the consequences of their designs. Civil engineering is a profession that holds life and death consequences. When engineers design a project, an error or mistake could result in property damage, personal injury, or death. Not understanding a product, while allowing its use, may equate to negligence if injury results. Not reading the product literature may also constitute negligence, should the product’s failure result in injury or damage. When products fail the engineer may be deemed the responsible party. Many engineers do not understand, or appreciate, the differences between reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe and the potential for liability when specifying each product. Whereas RCP is a rigid structure that is designed, built, and tested as a structure before it arrives at the construction site, the “structure” of HDPE pipe is actually built and tested in the field. Hence, HDPE pipe is not an “approved equal” substitute for RCP. This paper reviews the critical aspects regarding the decision to specify corrugated HDPE pipe. Know the difference.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Patricia D. Galloway | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:20:52Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:20:52Z | |
| date copyright | January 2008 | |
| date issued | 2008 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291052-3928%282008%29134%3A1%2887%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47905 | |
| description abstract | The engineer’s role in any design project is to design a project that meets the desired purpose, is constructible, and the health, safety, and welfare of the user is protected. Yet engineers do not always recognize the consequences of their designs. Civil engineering is a profession that holds life and death consequences. When engineers design a project, an error or mistake could result in property damage, personal injury, or death. Not understanding a product, while allowing its use, may equate to negligence if injury results. Not reading the product literature may also constitute negligence, should the product’s failure result in injury or damage. When products fail the engineer may be deemed the responsible party. Many engineers do not understand, or appreciate, the differences between reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe and the potential for liability when specifying each product. Whereas RCP is a rigid structure that is designed, built, and tested as a structure before it arrives at the construction site, the “structure” of HDPE pipe is actually built and tested in the field. Hence, HDPE pipe is not an “approved equal” substitute for RCP. This paper reviews the critical aspects regarding the decision to specify corrugated HDPE pipe. Know the difference. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Engineer’s Liability Considerations in Specifying Corrugated High Density Polyethylene Pipe | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 134 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(87) | |
| tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |