contributor author | Roger Owers | |
contributor author | Samuel T. Ariaratnam | |
contributor author | Daniel Armstrong | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:20:47Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:20:47Z | |
date copyright | April 2007 | |
date issued | 2007 | |
identifier other | %28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A2%28134%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47849 | |
description abstract | Lawyerization has become more and more prevalent in the engineering and construction industry. Some would argue the merits of firms’ retaining lawyers on staff as providing cost savings on projects through averting potential litigation. Others view lawyers as increasing project costs due to increased overhead. Therefore, it is important to understand the pros and cons of lawyerization as viewed by the contractor, designer, owner, manufacturer, and supplier. This paper discusses the current role of lawyers in the engineering and construction industry and examines the factors that contribute to the lawyerization of the industry. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Lawyerization of the Engineering and Construction Industry | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 133 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(134) | |
tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |