| contributor author | Alexandros C. Kallantzis | |
| contributor author | John D. Borcherding | |
| contributor author | James T. O’Connor | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:20:46Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:20:46Z | |
| date copyright | January 2007 | |
| date issued | 2007 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A1%2853%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47838 | |
| description abstract | Subsurface ground conditions present a big factor of uncertainty in a construction project. It is difficult to determine subsurface ground conditions even with a prebid site investigation. Nevertheless, such conditions must be included in the bid price. Due to this uncertainty, claims arise during the construction of a project. Many claims end up in litigation. This paper presents an analysis of legal cases dealing with differing subsurface ground conditions in construction contracts. By creating a database containing salient features from legal cases related to subsurface ground conditions, this research identifies the most important factors influencing the outcome of legal cases pertaining to subsurface ground conditions. Further, the most commonly used arguments by the litigating parties and the precedent cases supporting them are identified and categorized. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Evaluation of Differing Subsurface Ground Conditions in Construction Contracts | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 133 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:1(53) | |
| tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |