YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Survey of Risk Management in Major U.K. Companies

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Scott Baker
    ,
    David Ponniah
    ,
    Simon Smith
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1999)125:3(94)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Risk management consists of five stages, which are essential to the success of a major project. These five stages are identification, analysis, evaluation, response, and monitoring. The variations in using such risk management practices are considerable and are dependent on numerous factors such as the industry sector. This dependency is investigated and presented in this paper. Over 100 companies within the construction industry and oil and gas operators in the United Kingdom were surveyed through questionnaires that elicited information on the size and range of activities of the company, the techniques of risk analysis currently being used, the company's policy on responding to risk, as well as identifying specific risks encountered during any particular project. This paper highlights the vital conclusions accumulated from an analysis of the responses to the various sections of the questionnaire. The main conclusions from this paper are as follows: Personal and corporate experience and engineering judgment are the most successful qualitative techniques; expected monetary value, expected net present value, sensitivity analysis, and decision analysis are the principal quantitative techniques; and risk reduction (through staff training and education and the improvement of working conditions) is the most popular method of responding to risk.
    • Download: (162.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Survey of Risk Management in Major U.K. Companies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47483
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorScott Baker
    contributor authorDavid Ponniah
    contributor authorSimon Smith
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:14Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:20:14Z
    date copyrightJuly 1999
    date issued1999
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281999%29125%3A3%2894%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47483
    description abstractRisk management consists of five stages, which are essential to the success of a major project. These five stages are identification, analysis, evaluation, response, and monitoring. The variations in using such risk management practices are considerable and are dependent on numerous factors such as the industry sector. This dependency is investigated and presented in this paper. Over 100 companies within the construction industry and oil and gas operators in the United Kingdom were surveyed through questionnaires that elicited information on the size and range of activities of the company, the techniques of risk analysis currently being used, the company's policy on responding to risk, as well as identifying specific risks encountered during any particular project. This paper highlights the vital conclusions accumulated from an analysis of the responses to the various sections of the questionnaire. The main conclusions from this paper are as follows: Personal and corporate experience and engineering judgment are the most successful qualitative techniques; expected monetary value, expected net present value, sensitivity analysis, and decision analysis are the principal quantitative techniques; and risk reduction (through staff training and education and the improvement of working conditions) is the most popular method of responding to risk.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSurvey of Risk Management in Major U.K. Companies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume125
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1999)125:3(94)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian