YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Future Concerns in Environmental Engineering Graduate Education

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Richard G. Luthy
    ,
    David A. Bella
    ,
    James R. Hunt
    ,
    James H. Johnson, Jr.
    ,
    Desmond F. Lawler
    ,
    Charles R. O'Melia
    ,
    Frederick G. Pohland
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(361)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Directions for enhancing graduate education in environmental engineering to meet the challenges of the future must consider: (1) Education for versatility and perspective; (2) programmatic issues on research and graduate education; (3) relations between the environmental industry and graduate education; (4) a philosophy of graduate education; and (5) the role of the citizen engineer. Versatility and perspective requires expansion in the scope of graduate programs, and is dependent in part on enhancing undergraduate environmental engineering education. Relying on research grants for funding master's study is an inefficient use of resources; traineeships awarded on a competitive basis are needed. Undergraduate majors in the sciences are entering the profession and require exposure to engineering through the combination of relevant science, selected makeup, and graduate‐level courses. There is opportunity to take advantage of public interest in environmental issues to recruit minority graduate students. Environmental engineering education and the profession will benefit from improved communication and productive partnerships. Faculty may become more effective educators by recognizing the learning styles among students of different backgrounds, and by appreciating the progression in cognitive development during graduate education. We must educate environmental engineers in their responsibilities to help formulate and implement environmental policy.
    • Download: (1.445Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Future Concerns in Environmental Engineering Graduate Education

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47159
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRichard G. Luthy
    contributor authorDavid A. Bella
    contributor authorJames R. Hunt
    contributor authorJames H. Johnson, Jr.
    contributor authorDesmond F. Lawler
    contributor authorCharles R. O'Melia
    contributor authorFrederick G. Pohland
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:39Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:19:39Z
    date copyrightOctober 1992
    date issued1992
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281992%29118%3A4%28361%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47159
    description abstractDirections for enhancing graduate education in environmental engineering to meet the challenges of the future must consider: (1) Education for versatility and perspective; (2) programmatic issues on research and graduate education; (3) relations between the environmental industry and graduate education; (4) a philosophy of graduate education; and (5) the role of the citizen engineer. Versatility and perspective requires expansion in the scope of graduate programs, and is dependent in part on enhancing undergraduate environmental engineering education. Relying on research grants for funding master's study is an inefficient use of resources; traineeships awarded on a competitive basis are needed. Undergraduate majors in the sciences are entering the profession and require exposure to engineering through the combination of relevant science, selected makeup, and graduate‐level courses. There is opportunity to take advantage of public interest in environmental issues to recruit minority graduate students. Environmental engineering education and the profession will benefit from improved communication and productive partnerships. Faculty may become more effective educators by recognizing the learning styles among students of different backgrounds, and by appreciating the progression in cognitive development during graduate education. We must educate environmental engineers in their responsibilities to help formulate and implement environmental policy.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFuture Concerns in Environmental Engineering Graduate Education
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume118
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(361)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian