YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Environmental Impacts of Nutrient Removal Processes: Case Study

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Mark C. M. van Loosdrecht
    ,
    Takahiro Kuba
    ,
    Henry M. van Veldhuizen
    ,
    Frank A. Brandse
    ,
    Joseph J. Heijnen
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:1(33)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The influence of primary clarification of sewage on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a modified University of Cape Town (UCT) type wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP) has been studied on a full scale. Before or after the introduction of raw sewage, the sludge was characterized on (denitrifying) phosphorus-removing activities by batch tests. For both situations, mass and energy balances in the WWTP were made in order to evaluate the effect of presettling on the environmental impact of the treatment process. Extra chemical oxygen demand (COD) input due to the introduction of raw sewage improved the overall nitrogen removal, whereas P-removal remained good. However, the improvement of nitrogen removal resulted mainly from increased assimilation into extra sludge production, not from increased denitrification. In fact, results of the batch tests indicated that the denitrification activity after the introduction of raw sewage was almost similar to the sludge with presettled sewage. The introduction of raw sewage resulted in an increase of energy consumption, mainly due to lower methane production in the digester. This research shows that evaluating treatment processes solely on effluent quality can easily lead to overall adverse effects for the environment. The full environmental impact should also be considered for treatment processes.
    • Download: (991.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Environmental Impacts of Nutrient Removal Processes: Case Study

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/46675
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMark C. M. van Loosdrecht
    contributor authorTakahiro Kuba
    contributor authorHenry M. van Veldhuizen
    contributor authorFrank A. Brandse
    contributor authorJoseph J. Heijnen
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:54Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:18:54Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%281997%29123%3A1%2833%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46675
    description abstractThe influence of primary clarification of sewage on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a modified University of Cape Town (UCT) type wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP) has been studied on a full scale. Before or after the introduction of raw sewage, the sludge was characterized on (denitrifying) phosphorus-removing activities by batch tests. For both situations, mass and energy balances in the WWTP were made in order to evaluate the effect of presettling on the environmental impact of the treatment process. Extra chemical oxygen demand (COD) input due to the introduction of raw sewage improved the overall nitrogen removal, whereas P-removal remained good. However, the improvement of nitrogen removal resulted mainly from increased assimilation into extra sludge production, not from increased denitrification. In fact, results of the batch tests indicated that the denitrification activity after the introduction of raw sewage was almost similar to the sludge with presettled sewage. The introduction of raw sewage resulted in an increase of energy consumption, mainly due to lower methane production in the digester. This research shows that evaluating treatment processes solely on effluent quality can easily lead to overall adverse effects for the environment. The full environmental impact should also be considered for treatment processes.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEnvironmental Impacts of Nutrient Removal Processes: Case Study
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume123
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:1(33)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian