YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Global System Considerations for Progressive Collapse with Extensions to Other Natural and Man-Made Hazards

    Source: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2006:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Mohammed Ettouney
    ,
    Robert Smilowitz
    ,
    Margaret Tang
    ,
    Adam Hapij
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(403)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: One of the most frequently used approaches for minimizing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings is the alternate path method. The appeal of this method is primarily due to its relative simplicity and threat independent specification. Applications of the alternate path method typically employ a component design strategy in which the adequacy of the system is based on individual structural components successfully satisfying the acceptance criteria. This design philosophy is also used in evaluating other extreme loading conditions such as seismic loads and direct blast loads. However, the adequacy of the global structural system is not usually investigated during this component design process. This paper details the importance of investigating global effects when evaluating the potential for progressive collapse in buildings. There are two types of frames that will be evaluated: moment-resisting (sway) frames and nonsway frames that include lateral-force resisting elements, such as shear walls. The necessity for considering the global response of a damaged structure becomes apparent following the evaluation of the overall stability of these systems. In addition, the conclusions concerning progressive collapse investigations will be generalized for application to seismic and direct blast hazards. A simple design and analysis method will be introduced, along with the associated acceptance criteria.
    • Download: (963.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Global System Considerations for Progressive Collapse with Extensions to Other Natural and Man-Made Hazards

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/44466
    Collections
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMohammed Ettouney
    contributor authorRobert Smilowitz
    contributor authorMargaret Tang
    contributor authorAdam Hapij
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:15:17Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:15:17Z
    date copyrightNovember 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%282006%2920%3A4%28403%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44466
    description abstractOne of the most frequently used approaches for minimizing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings is the alternate path method. The appeal of this method is primarily due to its relative simplicity and threat independent specification. Applications of the alternate path method typically employ a component design strategy in which the adequacy of the system is based on individual structural components successfully satisfying the acceptance criteria. This design philosophy is also used in evaluating other extreme loading conditions such as seismic loads and direct blast loads. However, the adequacy of the global structural system is not usually investigated during this component design process. This paper details the importance of investigating global effects when evaluating the potential for progressive collapse in buildings. There are two types of frames that will be evaluated: moment-resisting (sway) frames and nonsway frames that include lateral-force resisting elements, such as shear walls. The necessity for considering the global response of a damaged structure becomes apparent following the evaluation of the overall stability of these systems. In addition, the conclusions concerning progressive collapse investigations will be generalized for application to seismic and direct blast hazards. A simple design and analysis method will be introduced, along with the associated acceptance criteria.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleGlobal System Considerations for Progressive Collapse with Extensions to Other Natural and Man-Made Hazards
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(403)
    treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2006:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian