YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Structural Response of Laterally Loaded Ridge Vent Light Frame Diaphragms

    Source: Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice:;2025:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 002::page 04025023-1
    Author:
    Niko Lopez
    ,
    Matthew Flores
    ,
    Pascual Dominguez Cruz
    ,
    Reynaud Serrette
    DOI: 10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1633
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Residential construction is a major segment of the built environment, and it accounts for substantial energy use in many regions—particularly in hot and cold climates. As efforts to address the impacts of climate change intensify, research on building envelopes, particularly in extreme climates, continues to evolve. Traditionally, a combination of eave, soffit, and roof vents has been used to passively cool attic spaces. Ridge vents have emerged as a highly effective passive cooling strategy. However, despite their benefits, the installation of ridge vents can disrupt diaphragm shear transfer at ridges, resulting in reduced strength and stiffness of the existing diaphragm. This paper presents the findings from a series of full-scale tests on 2.44×4.88  m (8×16  ft) wood and cold-formed steel light frame simply supported diaphragms sheathed with 9.5 mm (0.37 in.) wood structural panels. For each framing material, blocked, unblocked, and ridge-vented diaphragms were tested. The test results showed that compared to a blocked diaphragm, both the strength and stiffness of ridge-vented diaphragms were reduced. Specifically, the ridge-vented diaphragm peak strength was between 46% and 58% that of the blocked diaphragm, and between 62% and 70% of the unblocked diaphragm. Further, the ridge-vented diaphragm initial stiffness was between 41% and 50% that of the blocked diaphragm.
    • Download: (3.328Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Structural Response of Laterally Loaded Ridge Vent Light Frame Diaphragms

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307926
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNiko Lopez
    contributor authorMatthew Flores
    contributor authorPascual Dominguez Cruz
    contributor authorReynaud Serrette
    date accessioned2025-08-17T23:06:57Z
    date available2025-08-17T23:06:57Z
    date copyright5/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJSDCCC.SCENG-1633.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307926
    description abstractResidential construction is a major segment of the built environment, and it accounts for substantial energy use in many regions—particularly in hot and cold climates. As efforts to address the impacts of climate change intensify, research on building envelopes, particularly in extreme climates, continues to evolve. Traditionally, a combination of eave, soffit, and roof vents has been used to passively cool attic spaces. Ridge vents have emerged as a highly effective passive cooling strategy. However, despite their benefits, the installation of ridge vents can disrupt diaphragm shear transfer at ridges, resulting in reduced strength and stiffness of the existing diaphragm. This paper presents the findings from a series of full-scale tests on 2.44×4.88  m (8×16  ft) wood and cold-formed steel light frame simply supported diaphragms sheathed with 9.5 mm (0.37 in.) wood structural panels. For each framing material, blocked, unblocked, and ridge-vented diaphragms were tested. The test results showed that compared to a blocked diaphragm, both the strength and stiffness of ridge-vented diaphragms were reduced. Specifically, the ridge-vented diaphragm peak strength was between 46% and 58% that of the blocked diaphragm, and between 62% and 70% of the unblocked diaphragm. Further, the ridge-vented diaphragm initial stiffness was between 41% and 50% that of the blocked diaphragm.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleStructural Response of Laterally Loaded Ridge Vent Light Frame Diaphragms
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume30
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1633
    journal fristpage04025023-1
    journal lastpage04025023-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Structural Design and Construction Practice:;2025:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian