YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Avoiding and Resolving Construction Disputes and Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decisions

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2025:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 003::page 04525023-1
    Author:
    Cemre Cise Kadioglu Kumtepe
    DOI: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1269
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This article explores how blockchain and smart contracts can revolutionize dispute resolution in the construction industry, particularly by addressing enforceability issues seen in traditional mechanisms such as The Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseil’s (FIDIC) dispute adjudication board (DAB). While FIDIC’s DAB decisions are binding but not final, leading to enforcement challenges, blockchain-based solutions offer more immediate and efficient alternatives. Following doctrinal, normative and partially comparative qualitative legal research methodologies, this study examines the potential of smart contracts to automate contract performance and payment, manage task performance and resolve disputes. Promising developments in blockchain-based smart contracts enable secure, performance-based payments and incorporate an escrow mechanism to minimize disputes. Despite these advancements, risks related to noncompliance remain. This article proposes improvements, including private blockchains, escrow mechanisms, and expert pools and transposing a standardized contracting on-chain for dispute resolution to enhance compliance and reliability. By integrating blockchain with traditional systems, this article suggests that stakeholders such as FIDIC can formalize procedures and provide clearer, enforceable outcomes, addressing existing gaps in enforcement and improving access to justice in construction disputes. The construction industry has been exploring a variety of uses of blockchain. As blockchain and smart contracts are adopted further in the industry, dispute resolution and enforcement of outcomes via these technologies will be implemented widely in the future. Despite these challenges, the use of blockchain and smart contracts can facilitate the enforcement of DAB decisions, thereby eliminating the formal enforcement stage. We call arbitration institutions, regulators, and coders to explore the market and address issues related to blockchain enforcement. The design of platforms and procedures utilizing blockchain technology for DAB enforcement must incorporate trustworthy and reliable mechanisms. Collaborative efforts between arbitration institutions and technical developers are necessary to address this emerging need in the market. By developing robust, transparent systems, the gap between technology and legal processes can be bridged, ensuring that blockchain-based enforcement aligns with the established principles of justice and dispute resolution.
    • Download: (928.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Avoiding and Resolving Construction Disputes and Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decisions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307542
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCemre Cise Kadioglu Kumtepe
    date accessioned2025-08-17T22:51:01Z
    date available2025-08-17T22:51:01Z
    date copyright8/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJLADAH.LADR-1269.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307542
    description abstractThis article explores how blockchain and smart contracts can revolutionize dispute resolution in the construction industry, particularly by addressing enforceability issues seen in traditional mechanisms such as The Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseil’s (FIDIC) dispute adjudication board (DAB). While FIDIC’s DAB decisions are binding but not final, leading to enforcement challenges, blockchain-based solutions offer more immediate and efficient alternatives. Following doctrinal, normative and partially comparative qualitative legal research methodologies, this study examines the potential of smart contracts to automate contract performance and payment, manage task performance and resolve disputes. Promising developments in blockchain-based smart contracts enable secure, performance-based payments and incorporate an escrow mechanism to minimize disputes. Despite these advancements, risks related to noncompliance remain. This article proposes improvements, including private blockchains, escrow mechanisms, and expert pools and transposing a standardized contracting on-chain for dispute resolution to enhance compliance and reliability. By integrating blockchain with traditional systems, this article suggests that stakeholders such as FIDIC can formalize procedures and provide clearer, enforceable outcomes, addressing existing gaps in enforcement and improving access to justice in construction disputes. The construction industry has been exploring a variety of uses of blockchain. As blockchain and smart contracts are adopted further in the industry, dispute resolution and enforcement of outcomes via these technologies will be implemented widely in the future. Despite these challenges, the use of blockchain and smart contracts can facilitate the enforcement of DAB decisions, thereby eliminating the formal enforcement stage. We call arbitration institutions, regulators, and coders to explore the market and address issues related to blockchain enforcement. The design of platforms and procedures utilizing blockchain technology for DAB enforcement must incorporate trustworthy and reliable mechanisms. Collaborative efforts between arbitration institutions and technical developers are necessary to address this emerging need in the market. By developing robust, transparent systems, the gap between technology and legal processes can be bridged, ensuring that blockchain-based enforcement aligns with the established principles of justice and dispute resolution.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBlockchain and Smart Contracts for Avoiding and Resolving Construction Disputes and Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decisions
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume17
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1269
    journal fristpage04525023-1
    journal lastpage04525023-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2025:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian