YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Research on the Critical Stable Area of Air Cushion Surge Chambers in Hydropower Stations

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 004::page 04025014-1
    Author:
    TianYu Yao
    ,
    Jian Zhang
    ,
    Zhe Liu
    ,
    Chao Hu
    ,
    QinYi Wang
    ,
    Yi Liu
    ,
    Tong Wu
    ,
    WeiXin Qiu
    DOI: 10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-14116
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The Svee formula plays a crucial role in assessing the stability of hydropower systems with an air cushion surge chamber (ACSC). This formula is derived from the Thoma formula, a stability criterion for the common open-surge chamber (COSC), which overlooks the water inertia in the penstock and draft tube. Therefore, the validity of this approach demands further exploration. In this paper, based on the rigid water column (RWC) assumption, the second- and third-order mathematical models of a hydropower system with an ACSC were established. The Svee formula for the RWC models of different orders was analyzed. The stability criterion considering the real-life elasticity of the water column was also proposed to assess the plausibility of the Svee formula. The results indicate that both based on the RWC assumption and for the elastic water column (EWC), a hydropower system with an ACSC consistently fails to maintain stability under the equal output regulation (EOR) mode. The Svee formula opens to question in theory. Under the RWC assumption and the EOR mode, the derivation processes of Thoma and Svee formulas both neglected the water inertia in the penstock and draft tube, a crucial factor affecting system stability. As long as the preceding water inertia is considered, the system is unstable. Furthermore, the paper reveals that the water hammer reflection coefficients (WHRCs) of the hydropower system and the head loss coefficient significantly impact system stability, whereas the cross-sectional area of the ACSC has a comparatively minor influence. Surge chambers are typically installed in hydropower systems to effectively mitigate water hammer pressures. However, an inappropriate cross-sectional area of the surge chamber may lead to system instability when subjected to small oscillation. To ensure stable operation of the hydropower station, Svee ignored water inertia in the penstock and draft tube during the derivation process, obtaining the Svee stable area of the ACSC. This study assessed the applicability of the Svee formula by analyzing the stability of a hydropower system with an ACSC when the water inertia in the penstock and draft tube was considered. The research results indicate that the Svee formula is theoretically questionable. The stability of a hydropower system with an ACSC is primarily influenced by the WHRCs of the turbine, whereas the cross-sectional area of the ACSC exhibits a minimal influence on stability. Consequently, the constraints imposed by the Svee formula during the design of ACSCs should be lessened, which could reduce investment costs for hydropower stations and provide greater flexibility and freedom when designing ACSCs.
    • Download: (1.133Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Research on the Critical Stable Area of Air Cushion Surge Chambers in Hydropower Stations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307451
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTianYu Yao
    contributor authorJian Zhang
    contributor authorZhe Liu
    contributor authorChao Hu
    contributor authorQinYi Wang
    contributor authorYi Liu
    contributor authorTong Wu
    contributor authorWeiXin Qiu
    date accessioned2025-08-17T22:47:19Z
    date available2025-08-17T22:47:19Z
    date copyright7/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJHEND8.HYENG-14116.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307451
    description abstractThe Svee formula plays a crucial role in assessing the stability of hydropower systems with an air cushion surge chamber (ACSC). This formula is derived from the Thoma formula, a stability criterion for the common open-surge chamber (COSC), which overlooks the water inertia in the penstock and draft tube. Therefore, the validity of this approach demands further exploration. In this paper, based on the rigid water column (RWC) assumption, the second- and third-order mathematical models of a hydropower system with an ACSC were established. The Svee formula for the RWC models of different orders was analyzed. The stability criterion considering the real-life elasticity of the water column was also proposed to assess the plausibility of the Svee formula. The results indicate that both based on the RWC assumption and for the elastic water column (EWC), a hydropower system with an ACSC consistently fails to maintain stability under the equal output regulation (EOR) mode. The Svee formula opens to question in theory. Under the RWC assumption and the EOR mode, the derivation processes of Thoma and Svee formulas both neglected the water inertia in the penstock and draft tube, a crucial factor affecting system stability. As long as the preceding water inertia is considered, the system is unstable. Furthermore, the paper reveals that the water hammer reflection coefficients (WHRCs) of the hydropower system and the head loss coefficient significantly impact system stability, whereas the cross-sectional area of the ACSC has a comparatively minor influence. Surge chambers are typically installed in hydropower systems to effectively mitigate water hammer pressures. However, an inappropriate cross-sectional area of the surge chamber may lead to system instability when subjected to small oscillation. To ensure stable operation of the hydropower station, Svee ignored water inertia in the penstock and draft tube during the derivation process, obtaining the Svee stable area of the ACSC. This study assessed the applicability of the Svee formula by analyzing the stability of a hydropower system with an ACSC when the water inertia in the penstock and draft tube was considered. The research results indicate that the Svee formula is theoretically questionable. The stability of a hydropower system with an ACSC is primarily influenced by the WHRCs of the turbine, whereas the cross-sectional area of the ACSC exhibits a minimal influence on stability. Consequently, the constraints imposed by the Svee formula during the design of ACSCs should be lessened, which could reduce investment costs for hydropower stations and provide greater flexibility and freedom when designing ACSCs.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleResearch on the Critical Stable Area of Air Cushion Surge Chambers in Hydropower Stations
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-14116
    journal fristpage04025014-1
    journal lastpage04025014-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian