YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Paradox in Practice: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Reporting among Construction Workers in Kuwait and Denmark

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 007::page 04025078-1
    Author:
    Mohamad Iyad Al-Khiami
    ,
    Søren Munch Lindhard
    ,
    Søren Wandahl
    DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15899
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a significant health issue among construction workers, with prevalence influenced by factors such as personal demographics, exposure to work risk factors, and working conditions. This study addresses a research gap by comparing WMSD prevalence between Kuwait and Denmark; two countries with contrasting working conditions. Data were collected from 117 workers in Kuwait and 47 in Denmark using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Results showed that 78.72% of Danish workers reported discomfort in at least one body part compared to 52.14% in Kuwait, despite Denmark’s comparatively better working conditions. Additionally, absenteeism due to WMSDs was higher in Denmark (29.79%) than in Kuwait (9.40%). This paradoxical finding led to further analysis using logistic regression that indicated country was a significant predictor of WMSD reporting (OR=3.38, p<0.05), with Danish workers being substantially more likely to report WMSDs than their Kuwaiti counterparts. This suggested potential underreporting in Kuwait, prompting an investigation into organizational, economic, and cultural factors that may influence reporting behaviors. Specifically, Kuwait’s high power distance and uncertainty avoidance may contribute to miscommunication and underreporting, while Denmark’s individualistic culture encourages transparency. This study makes two primary contributions to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by: (1) providing the first cross cultural analysis of WMSD prevalence between Gulf Cooperation Council and Nordic construction sectors, and (2) demonstrating that country factors—likely cultural in nature—are stronger predictors of WMSD reporting than individual worker personal demographics. For Kuwait, this implies a need for improved reporting systems, greater worker empowerment, and enhanced working conditions, while Denmark would benefit from a focus on strengthening preventive measures. Future research should further explore the role of cultural influences on WMSD reporting. This study underscores the importance of culturally informed approaches in developing effective workplace health and safety strategies. This research reveals important insights about how country-specific characteristics affect the reporting of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in construction projects. By comparing construction workers in Kuwait and Denmark, we found that despite better working conditions in Denmark, Danish workers reported more WMSDs than their Kuwaiti counterparts. This unexpected finding highlights that workplace culture significantly influences whether workers report health issues. For construction managers and safety professionals, these findings suggest: (1) Traditional health and safety metrics may underestimate WMSD prevalence in cultures where workers are hesitant to report issues. (2) Anonymous reporting systems could encourage more accurate WMSD reporting in high power-distance cultures. (3) Worker empowerment programs and supportive leadership are crucial for creating an environment where health concerns can be openly discussed. (4) Safety training programs should be culturally adapted rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach. (5) Regular ergonomic assessments should be combined with efforts to understand and address cultural, organizational, and economic barriers to reporting. These insights are particularly relevant for international construction companies operating across different cultural contexts and for organizations employing multicultural workforces.
    • Download: (1.688Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Paradox in Practice: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Reporting among Construction Workers in Kuwait and Denmark

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307279
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMohamad Iyad Al-Khiami
    contributor authorSøren Munch Lindhard
    contributor authorSøren Wandahl
    date accessioned2025-08-17T22:40:31Z
    date available2025-08-17T22:40:31Z
    date copyright7/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJCEMD4.COENG-15899.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307279
    description abstractWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a significant health issue among construction workers, with prevalence influenced by factors such as personal demographics, exposure to work risk factors, and working conditions. This study addresses a research gap by comparing WMSD prevalence between Kuwait and Denmark; two countries with contrasting working conditions. Data were collected from 117 workers in Kuwait and 47 in Denmark using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Results showed that 78.72% of Danish workers reported discomfort in at least one body part compared to 52.14% in Kuwait, despite Denmark’s comparatively better working conditions. Additionally, absenteeism due to WMSDs was higher in Denmark (29.79%) than in Kuwait (9.40%). This paradoxical finding led to further analysis using logistic regression that indicated country was a significant predictor of WMSD reporting (OR=3.38, p<0.05), with Danish workers being substantially more likely to report WMSDs than their Kuwaiti counterparts. This suggested potential underreporting in Kuwait, prompting an investigation into organizational, economic, and cultural factors that may influence reporting behaviors. Specifically, Kuwait’s high power distance and uncertainty avoidance may contribute to miscommunication and underreporting, while Denmark’s individualistic culture encourages transparency. This study makes two primary contributions to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by: (1) providing the first cross cultural analysis of WMSD prevalence between Gulf Cooperation Council and Nordic construction sectors, and (2) demonstrating that country factors—likely cultural in nature—are stronger predictors of WMSD reporting than individual worker personal demographics. For Kuwait, this implies a need for improved reporting systems, greater worker empowerment, and enhanced working conditions, while Denmark would benefit from a focus on strengthening preventive measures. Future research should further explore the role of cultural influences on WMSD reporting. This study underscores the importance of culturally informed approaches in developing effective workplace health and safety strategies. This research reveals important insights about how country-specific characteristics affect the reporting of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in construction projects. By comparing construction workers in Kuwait and Denmark, we found that despite better working conditions in Denmark, Danish workers reported more WMSDs than their Kuwaiti counterparts. This unexpected finding highlights that workplace culture significantly influences whether workers report health issues. For construction managers and safety professionals, these findings suggest: (1) Traditional health and safety metrics may underestimate WMSD prevalence in cultures where workers are hesitant to report issues. (2) Anonymous reporting systems could encourage more accurate WMSD reporting in high power-distance cultures. (3) Worker empowerment programs and supportive leadership are crucial for creating an environment where health concerns can be openly discussed. (4) Safety training programs should be culturally adapted rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach. (5) Regular ergonomic assessments should be combined with efforts to understand and address cultural, organizational, and economic barriers to reporting. These insights are particularly relevant for international construction companies operating across different cultural contexts and for organizations employing multicultural workforces.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleParadox in Practice: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Reporting among Construction Workers in Kuwait and Denmark
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15899
    journal fristpage04025078-1
    journal lastpage04025078-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian