YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparative Analysis of Three Methodological Frameworks for Bridge Asset Management

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 005::page 04025029-1
    Author:
    Gary Sciulli
    ,
    Piervincenzo Rizzo
    ,
    Josh Kurlander
    ,
    Braelyn Brozik
    DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15728
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Bridge asset management refers to the process of planning, organizing, and directing all activities related to the life cycle of bridges. The process includes strategies to prioritize maintenance and provide cost-effective decisions about rehabilitation or replacement. In the US, the transportation agency of each state has its own guideline to prioritize intervention. In some cases, this is done by applying systematic methodologies based on different characteristics of the assets in order to schedule timely interventions and minimize adverse effects. In the study presented in this paper, three data-driven strategies based on the aggregation of information from the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) were applied to the bridges of Pennsylvania. Using data related to the year 2021, a ranking of the worst to the best bridge was obtained from each strategy. Then, three representative bridges of the city of Pittsburgh were selected and the NBI data related to the timeframe 1992–2023 were imported to identify trends attributable to degradation. The results show that the methods lead to three different rankings, whereas their the long-term trends agree.
    • Download: (1.282Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparative Analysis of Three Methodological Frameworks for Bridge Asset Management

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307263
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGary Sciulli
    contributor authorPiervincenzo Rizzo
    contributor authorJosh Kurlander
    contributor authorBraelyn Brozik
    date accessioned2025-08-17T22:39:52Z
    date available2025-08-17T22:39:52Z
    date copyright5/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJCEMD4.COENG-15728.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307263
    description abstractBridge asset management refers to the process of planning, organizing, and directing all activities related to the life cycle of bridges. The process includes strategies to prioritize maintenance and provide cost-effective decisions about rehabilitation or replacement. In the US, the transportation agency of each state has its own guideline to prioritize intervention. In some cases, this is done by applying systematic methodologies based on different characteristics of the assets in order to schedule timely interventions and minimize adverse effects. In the study presented in this paper, three data-driven strategies based on the aggregation of information from the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) were applied to the bridges of Pennsylvania. Using data related to the year 2021, a ranking of the worst to the best bridge was obtained from each strategy. Then, three representative bridges of the city of Pittsburgh were selected and the NBI data related to the timeframe 1992–2023 were imported to identify trends attributable to degradation. The results show that the methods lead to three different rankings, whereas their the long-term trends agree.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleA Comparative Analysis of Three Methodological Frameworks for Bridge Asset Management
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15728
    journal fristpage04025029-1
    journal lastpage04025029-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian