YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Design of Geodetic Monitoring Networks by Minimal Detectable Displacement Evaluation under Confidence and Sensitivity Analysis

    Source: Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 001::page 04024016-1
    Author:
    Felipe Carvajal Rodríguez
    ,
    Ivandro Klein
    ,
    Luis Koenig Veiga
    DOI: 10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1535
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This study investigated the differences between minimal detectable displacement (MDD) values derived from confidence and sensitivity analysis, focusing on the a priori analysis of geodetic monitoring networks using a unified approach from the literature. Several aspects were examined: network configuration (number of observations), spatial dimension of network points, and its functional model. Our results show that these aspects have a major role in the minimal detectable displacement values for both confidence and sensitivity approaches, thereby influencing the network’s capacity to detect displacements. Specifically, increasing the number of observations reduces the discrepancies between the displacements detected by the confidence and sensitivity approaches. We also show that geodetic networks with the same parameter dimensionality but different spatial dimensions [one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), or three-dimensional (3D)] have different capabilities for detecting displacements. Increasing the network redundancy should be more efficient for 1D networks than for 3D networks. In addition, the larger the spatial dimension of the network, the smaller is the maximum MDD value for a given h=rank(Cd^). Lastly, we present an example of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) network design for geodetic monitoring, demonstrating a direct relationship between time span and the Type 2 error probability.
    • Download: (2.320Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Design of Geodetic Monitoring Networks by Minimal Detectable Displacement Evaluation under Confidence and Sensitivity Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306819
    Collections
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFelipe Carvajal Rodríguez
    contributor authorIvandro Klein
    contributor authorLuis Koenig Veiga
    date accessioned2025-08-17T22:21:31Z
    date available2025-08-17T22:21:31Z
    date copyright2/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJSUED2.SUENG-1535.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306819
    description abstractThis study investigated the differences between minimal detectable displacement (MDD) values derived from confidence and sensitivity analysis, focusing on the a priori analysis of geodetic monitoring networks using a unified approach from the literature. Several aspects were examined: network configuration (number of observations), spatial dimension of network points, and its functional model. Our results show that these aspects have a major role in the minimal detectable displacement values for both confidence and sensitivity approaches, thereby influencing the network’s capacity to detect displacements. Specifically, increasing the number of observations reduces the discrepancies between the displacements detected by the confidence and sensitivity approaches. We also show that geodetic networks with the same parameter dimensionality but different spatial dimensions [one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), or three-dimensional (3D)] have different capabilities for detecting displacements. Increasing the network redundancy should be more efficient for 1D networks than for 3D networks. In addition, the larger the spatial dimension of the network, the smaller is the maximum MDD value for a given h=rank(Cd^). Lastly, we present an example of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) network design for geodetic monitoring, demonstrating a direct relationship between time span and the Type 2 error probability.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDesign of Geodetic Monitoring Networks by Minimal Detectable Displacement Evaluation under Confidence and Sensitivity Analysis
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1535
    journal fristpage04024016-1
    journal lastpage04024016-8
    page8
    treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian