Show simple item record

contributor authorMaaita, Jamal-Odysseas
contributor authorProusalis, Dimitrios
date accessioned2025-04-21T10:35:34Z
date available2025-04-21T10:35:34Z
date copyright12/9/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn1555-1415
identifier othercnd_020_01_011008.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306509
description abstractA nonregular oscillation is not enough to define a system as chaotic. A more in-depth investigation is required to prove the existence of chaotic behavior, which is challenging. Although many scientists use the Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents to detect chaos, it is not the only method. Several scientists have introduced different methods that utilize various properties of dynamical systems. Hidden Attractors may be chaotic or regular. The fact that they have small basins of attraction introduces difficulties in locating and characterizing them. The paper presents four different chaotic indicators based on the evolution of the deviation vectors: the maximal Lyapunov Exponent, the Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents, the Fast Lyapunov Index (FLI), and the Small Alignment Index. It includes their properties and the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Also, it includes the algorithms to calculate them and their implementation in Python. The paper closes with a comparison between the four indices applied to a system with hidden attractors.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleA Comparison Between Four Chaotic Indicators in Systems With Hidden Attractors
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics
identifier doi10.1115/1.4067010
journal fristpage11008-1
journal lastpage11008-12
page12
treeJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics:;2024:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record